<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-CA">
	<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Vincent+Eijsink</id>
	<title>CAZypedia - User contributions [en-ca]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Vincent+Eijsink"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Vincent_Eijsink"/>
	<updated>2026-05-04T20:04:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.10</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12188</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12188"/>
		<updated>2018-01-20T10:31:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{CuratorApproved}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Crouch2016 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc-containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically active AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 binds chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rx_scheme_LPMOs.png|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 2. Reaction schemes proposed for LPMOs in a) 2010 and b) 2017.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure 2). Phillips ''et al'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead to spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown in Fig. 2, panel b, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO to its Cu(I) state, which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, namely H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Bissaro ''et al.'' point out that H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; will be generated under the reaction conditions that are normally used to assess LPMO functionality. Further work is needed to assess the validity of the various proposed LPMO mechanisms. One key challenge in such work is that LPMOs become rapidly inactivated due to oxidative damage in the catalytic center &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reported catalytic rates of LPMOs, including AA10 LPMOs,  under standard conditions (= the presence of a reductant and O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), are remarkably low and tend to vary from 1 to 10 per minute (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Agger2014 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Although not usually reported in the literature, progress curves for LPMO reactions are notoriously non-linear and there is thus little available kinetic data (see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for relatively high quality kinetic data). Importantly, it has been shown that LPMO rates can be drastically enhanced by using light &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Cannella2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; or H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; to drive the LPMO reaction. In a recent detailed kinetic study of CBP21, using hydrogen peroxide to drive the reaction, Kuusk et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; determined the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for chitin oxidation to be 5.6 s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and concluded that the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-driven degradation of chitin was in the order of 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; M&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:His_brace_4ALC_label.png|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 3. The active site of ''Ef''LPMO10 (''Ef''CBM33).''' The residues involved in, and in close proximity to, the histidine brace are shown in stick representation. The copper atom is shown as a golden sphere. Water molecules are shown as red spheres. The copper atom is coordinated in a trigonal bipyrimidal geometry. The figure is made from the structure of ''Ef''LPMO10 (also known as &amp;quot;''Ef''CBM33&amp;quot; from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) which was obtained by a low radiation dose X-ray crystallographic experiment that yielded an active site containing a copper atom in its Cu(II) state (normally copper atoms are reduced by X-ray photoreduction).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. 3) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was settled for AA9 LPMOs by Quinlan et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Phillips et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;, although this is not always formally correct (as exemplified by Fig. 3). One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. 3) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AA10_diversityPNG.PNG|thumb|right|600px|'''Figure 4. LPMO active sites.''' Active sites and their &amp;quot;second shell&amp;quot; of residues surrounding the histidine brace. CBP21 (dark grey) CelS2 (green), ScLPMO10B (orange) and TaLPMO9A (pink). The figure is adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Span2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure 4 shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; describes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO. The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by the Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely involved in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with a copper ion bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as discussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of the true nature of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Cannella2016 pmid=27041218&lt;br /&gt;
#Crouch2016 pmid=26801613&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12181</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12181"/>
		<updated>2018-01-19T14:06:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Crouch2016 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc-containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically active AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 binds chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rx_scheme_LPMOs.png|thumb|right|600px|'''Figure 2. Reaction schemes proposed for LPMOs in a) 2010 and b) 2017.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure 2). Phillips ''et al'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead to spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown in Fig. 2, panel b, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO to its Cu(I) state, which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, namely H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Bissaro ''et al.'' point out that H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; will be generated under the reaction conditions that are normally used to assess LPMO functionality. Further work is needed to assess the validity of the various proposed LPMO mechanisms. One key challenge in such work is that LPMOs become rapidly inactivated due to oxidative damage in the catalytic center &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reported catalytic rates of LPMOs, including AA10 LPMOs,  under standard conditions (= the presence of a reductant and O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), are remarkably low and tend to vary from 1 to 10 per minute (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Agger2014 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Although not usually reported in the literature, progress curves for LPMO reactions are notoriously non-linear and there is thus little available kinetic data (see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for relatively high quality kinetic data). Importantly, it has been shown that LPMO rates can be drastically enhanced by using light &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Cannella2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; or H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; to drive the LPMO reaction. In a recent detailed kinetic study of CBP21, using hydrogen peroxide to drive the reaction, Kuusk et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; determined the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for chitin oxidation to be 5.6 s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and concluded that the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-driven degradation of chitin was in the order of 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; M&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:His_brace_4ALC_label.png|thumb|left|400px|''''''Figure 3. The active site of ''Ef''LPMO10 (''Ef''CBM33).''' The residues involved in, and in close proximity to, the histidine brace are shown in stick representation. The copper atom is shown as a golden sphere. Water molecules are shown as red spheres. The copper atom is coordinated in a trigonal bipyrimidal geometry. The figure is made from the structure of ''Ef''LPMO10 (also known as &amp;quot;''Ef''CBM33&amp;quot; from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) which was obtained by a low radiation dose X-ray crystallographic experiment that yielded an active site containing a copper atom in its Cu(II) state (normally copper atoms are reduced by X-ray photoreduction).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. 3) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was settled for AA9 LPMOs by Quinlan et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Phillips et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;, although this is not always formally correct (as exemplified by Fig. 3). One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. 3) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AA10_diversityPNG.PNG|thumb|right|600px|'''''''''Figure 4. LPMO active sites.''' Active sites and their &amp;quot;second shell&amp;quot; of residues surrounding the histidine brace. CBP21 (dark grey) CelS2 (green), ScLPMO10B (orange) and TaLPMO9A (pink). The figure is adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Span2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure 4 shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; describes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO. The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by the Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely involved in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with a copper ion bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as discussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of the true nature of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Cannella2016 pmid=27041218&lt;br /&gt;
#Crouch2016 pmid=26801613&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12180</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12180"/>
		<updated>2018-01-19T14:03:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Crouch2016 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc-containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically active AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 binds chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rx_scheme_LPMOs.png|thumb|right|600px|'''Figure 2. Reaction schemes proposed for LPMOs in a) 2010 and b) 2017.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure 2). Phillips ''et al'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead to spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown in Fig. 2, panel b, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO to its Cu(I) state, which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, namely H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Bissaro ''et al.'' point out that H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; will be generated under the reaction conditions that are normally used to assess LPMO functionality. Further work is needed to assess the validity of the various proposed LPMO mechanisms. One key challenge in such work is that LPMOs become rapidly inactivated due to oxidative damage in the catalytic center &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reported catalytic rates of LPMOs, including AA10 LPMOs,  under standard conditions (= the presence of a reductant and O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), are remarkably low and tend to vary from 1 to 10 per minute (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Agger2014 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Although not usually reported in the literature, progress curves for LPMO reactions are notoriously non-linear and there is thus little available kinetic data (see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for relatively high quality kinetic data). Importantly, it has been shown that LPMO rates can be drastically enhanced by using light &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Cannella2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; or H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; to drive the LPMO reaction. In a recent detailed kinetic study of CBP21, using hydrogen peroxide to drive the reaction, Kuusk et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; determined the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for chitin oxidation to be 5.6 s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and concluded that the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-driven degradation of chitin was in the order of 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; M&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:His_brace_4ALC_label.png|thumb|left|400px|''''''Figure 3. The active site of ''Ef''LPMO10 (''Ef''CBM33).''' The residues involved in, and in close proximity to, the histidine brace are shown in stick representation. The copper atom is shown as a golden sphere. Water molecules are shown as red spheres. The copper atom is coordinated in a trigonal bipyrimidal geometry. The figure is made from the structure of ''Ef''LPMO10 (also known as &amp;quot;''Ef''CBM33&amp;quot; from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) which was obtained by a low radiation dose X-ray crystallographic experiment that yielded an active site containing a copper atom in its Cu(II) state (normally copper atoms are reduced by X-ray photoreduction).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. 3) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was settled for AA9 LPMOs by Quinlan et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Phillips et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;, although this is not always formally correct (as exemplified by Fig. 3). One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. 3) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AA10_diversityPNG.PNG|thumb|right|600px|'''''''''Figure 4. LPMO active sites.''' Active sites and their &amp;quot;second shell&amp;quot; of residues surrounding the histidine brace. CBP21 (dark grey) CelS2 (green), ScLPMO10B (orange) and TaLPMO9A (pink). The figure is adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Span2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure 4 shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; describes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO. The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by the Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely involved in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with a copper ion bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as discussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Cannella2016 pmid=27041218&lt;br /&gt;
#Crouch2016 pmid=26801613&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12139</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12139"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T18:42:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Crouch2016 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc-containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically active AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 binds chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rx_mech.png|thumb|right|600px|'''Figure 2. Reaction mechanisms proposed for LPMOs in a) 2010 and b) 2017.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure 2). Phillips ''et al'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead to spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown in Fig. 2, panel b, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO to its Cu(I) state, which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, namely H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Bissaro ''et al.'' point out that H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; will be generated under the reaction conditions that are normally used to assess LPMO functionality. Further work is needed to assess the validity of the various proposed LPMO mechanisms. One key challenge in such work is that LPMOs become rapidly inactivated due to oxidative damage in the catalytic center &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reported catalytic rates of LPMOs, including AA10 LPMOs,  under standard conditions (= the presence of a reductant and O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), are remarkably low and tend to vary from 1 to 10 per minute (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Agger2014 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Although not usually reported in the literature, progress curves for LPMO reactions are notoriously non-linear and there is thus little available kinetic data (see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for relatively high quality kinetic data). Importantly, it has been shown that LPMO rates can be drastically enhanced by using light &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Cannella2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; or H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; to drive the LPMO reaction. In a recent detailed kinetic study of CBP21, using hydrogen peroxide to drive the reaction, Kuusk et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; determined the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for chitin oxidation to be 5.6 s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and concluded that the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-driven degradation of chitin was in the order of 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; M&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:His_brace_4ALC_label.png|thumb|left|400px|''''''Figure 3. The active site of ''Ef''LPMO10 (''Ef''CBM33).''' The residues involved in, and in close proximity to, the histidine brace are shown in stick representation. The copper atom is shown as a golden sphere. Water molecules are shown as red spheres. The copper atom is coordinated in a trigonal bipyrimidal geometry. The figure is made from the structure of ''Ef''LPMO10 (also known as &amp;quot;''Ef''CBM33&amp;quot; from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) which was obtained by a low X-ray radiation experiment that yielded an active site containing a copper atom in its Cu(II) state (normally copper atoms are reduced by X-ray photoreduction).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. 3) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;, although this is not always formally correct (as exemplified by Fig. 3). One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. 3) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AA10_diversityPNG.PNG|thumb|right|600px|'''''''''Figure 4. LPMO active sites.''' Active sites and their &amp;quot;second shell&amp;quot; of CBP21 (dark grey) CelS2 (green), ScLPMO10B (orange) and TaLPMO9A (pink). The figure is adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Span2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure 4 shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; describes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO. The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by the Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely involved in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with a copper ion bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as discussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Cannella2016 pmid=27041218&lt;br /&gt;
#Crouch2016 pmid=26801613&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12138</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12138"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T18:37:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Crouch2016 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc-containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically active AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 binds chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rx_mech.png|thumb|right|600px|'''Figure 2. Reaction mechanisms proposed for LPMOs in a) 2010 and b) 2017.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure 2). Phillips ''et al'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead to spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown in Fig. 2, panel b, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO to its Cu(I) state, which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, namely H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Bissaro ''et al.'' point out that H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; will be generated under the reaction conditions that are normally used to assess LPMO functionality. Further work is needed to assess the validity of the various proposed LPMO mechanisms. One key challenge in such work is that LPMOs become rapidly inactivated due to oxidative damage in the catalytic center &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reported catalytic rates of LPMOs, including AA10 LPMOs,  under standard conditions (= the presence of a reductant and O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), are remarkably low and tend to vary from 1 to 10 per minute (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Agger2014 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Although not usually reported in the literature, progress curves for LPMO reactions are notoriously non-linear and there is thus little available kinetic data (see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for relatively high quality kinetic data). Importantly, it has been shown that LPMO rates can be drastically enhanced by using light &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Cannella2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; or H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; to drive the LPMO reaction. In a recent detailed kinetic study of CBP21, using hydrogen peroxide to drive the reaction, Kuusk et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; determined the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for chitin oxidation to be 5.6 s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and concluded that the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-driven degradation of chitin was in the order of 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; M&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:His_brace_4ALC_label.png|thumb|left|400px|''''''Figure 3. The active site of ''Ef''LPMO10 (''Ef''CBM33).''' The residues involved in, and in close proximity to, the histidine brace are shown in stick representation. The copper atom is shown as a golden sphere. Water molecules are shown as red spheres. The copper atom is coordinated in a trigonal bipyrimidal geometry. The figure is made from the structure of ''Ef''LPMO10 (also known as &amp;quot;''Ef''CBM33&amp;quot; from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) which was obtained by a low X-ray radiation experiment that yielded an active site containing a copper atom in its Cu(II) state (normally copper atoms are reduced by X-ray photoreduction).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. 3) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;, although this is not always formally correct (as exemplified by Fig. 3). One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. 3) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AA10_diversityPNG.PNG|thumb|right|600px|'''''''''Figure 4. LPMO active sites.''' Active sites and their &amp;quot;second shell&amp;quot; of CBP21 (dark grey) CelS2 (green), ScLPMO10B (orange) and TaLPMO9A (pink). The figure is adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Span2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure 4 shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Cannella2016 pmid=27041218&lt;br /&gt;
#Crouch2016 pmid=26801613&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12137</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12137"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T18:27:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Crouch2016 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc-containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically active AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 binds chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rx_mech.png|thumb|right|600px|'''Figure 2. Reaction mechanisms proposed for LPMOs in a) 2010 and b) 2017.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure 2). Phillips ''et al'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead to spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown in Fig. 2, panel b, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO to its Cu(I) state, which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, namely H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. Bissaro ''et al.'' point out that H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; will be generated under the reaction conditions that are normally used to assess LPMO functionality. Further work is needed to assess the validity of the various proposed LPMO mechanisms. One key challenge in such work is that LPMOs become rapidly inactivated due to oxidative damage in the catalytic center &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reported catalytic rates of LPMOs, including AA10 LPMOs,  under standard conditions (= the presence of a reductant and O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), are remarkably low and tend to vary from 1 to 10 per minute (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Agger2014 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Although not usually reported in the literature, progress curves for LPMO reactions are notoriously non-linear and there is thus little available kinetic data (see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for relatively high quality kinetic data). Importantly, it has been shown that LPMO rates can be drastically enhanced by using light &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Cannella2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; or H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; to drive the LPMO reaction. In a recent detailed kinetic study of CBP21, using hydrogen peroxide to drive the reaction, Kuusk et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; determined the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for chitin oxidation to be 5.6 s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and concluded that the k&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;cat&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;/K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;-driven degradation of chitin was in the order of 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; M&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:His_brace_4ALC_label.png|thumb|left|400px|''''''Figure 3. The active site of ''Ef''LPMO10 (''Ef''CBM33).''' The residues involved in, and in close proximity to, the histidine brace are shown in stick representation. The copper atom is shown as a golden sphere. Water molecules are showed as red spheres. The copper atom is coordinated in a trigonal bipyrimidal geometry. The figure is made from the structure of ''Ef''LPMO10 (also known as &amp;quot;''Ef''CBM33&amp;quot; from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) which was obtained by a low X-ray radiation experiment that yielded an active site containing a copper atom in its Cu(II) state (normally copper atoms are reduced by X-ray photoreduction).]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. 3) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. 3) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AA10_diversityPNG.PNG|thumb|right|600px|'''''''''Figure 4. LPMO active sites.''' Active sites and their &amp;quot;second shell&amp;quot; of CBP21 (dark grey) CelS2 (green), ScLPMO10B (orange) and TaLPMO9A (pink). The figure is adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Span2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure 4 shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Cannella2016 pmid=27041218&lt;br /&gt;
#Crouch2016 pmid=26801613&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12063</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12063"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T21:35:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Crouch2016 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure Z - showing the old and the new equation). Phillips et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown in Fig. Z, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H2O2-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO to its Cu(I) state, which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O2, namely H2O2. Bissaro et al. point out that H2O2 wil be generated under the reaction conditions that are normally used to assess LPMO functioality. Further work is needed to assess the validity of the various proposed LPMO mechanisms. One key challenge in such work is that LPMOs become rapidly inactivated due to oxidative damage in the catalytic center &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reported catalytic rates of LPMOs, including AA10 LPMOs,  under standard condiitons (= the presence of a reductant and O2), are remarkably low and tend to vary from 1 to 10 per minute (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Agger2014 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; MORE REFs needed?). Although not usually reported in the literature, progress curves for LPMO reactions are notoriously non-linear and there is thus little available kinetic data (see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for relatively high quality kinetic data). Importantly, it has been shown that LPMO rates can be drastically enhanced by using light &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Cannella2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; or H2O2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; to drive the LPMO reaction. In a recent detailed kinetic study of CBP21, using hydrogen peroxide to drive the reaction, Kuusk et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; determined the kcat for chitin oxidation found here to be 5.6 s-1, and concluded that the kcat/Km for H2O2-driven degradation of chitin was in the order of 106 m-1 s-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. X) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. X) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Span2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure Y (=Fig. 3C in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Cannella2016 pmid=27041218&lt;br /&gt;
#Crouch2016 pmid=26801613&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12062</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12062"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T21:33:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Crouch2016 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure Z - showing the old and the new equation). Phillips et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown in Fig. Z, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H2O2-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO to its Cu(I) state, which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O2, namely H2O2. Bissaro et al. point out that H2O2 wil be generated under the reaction conditions that are normally used to assess LPMO functioality. Further work is needed to assess the validity of the various proposed LPMO mechanisms. One key challenge in such work is that LPMOs become rapidly inactivated due to oxidative damage in the catalytic center &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reported catalytic rates of LPMOs, including AA10 LPMOs,  under standard condiitons (= the presence of a reductant and O2), are remarkably low and tend to vary from 1 to 10 per minute (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Agger2014 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; MORE REFs needed?). Although not usually reported in the literature, progress curves for LPMO reactions are notoriously non-linear and there is thus little available kinetic data (see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for relatively high quality kinetic data). Importantly, it has been shown that LPMO rates can be drastically enhanced by using light &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Cannella2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; or H2O2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; to drive the LPMO reaction. In a recent detailed kinetic study of CBP21, using hydrogen peroxide to drive the reaction, Kuusk et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; determined the kcat for chitin oxidation found here to be 5.6 s-1, and concluded that the kcat/Km for H2O2-driven degradation of chitin was in the order of 106 m-1 s-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. X) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. X) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Spam2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure Y (=Fig. 3C in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Cannella2016 pmid=27041218&lt;br /&gt;
#Crouch2016 pmid=26801613&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12058</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12058"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T21:22:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure Z - showing the old and the new equation). Phillips et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown in Fig. Z, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H2O2-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO to its Cu(I) state, which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O2, namely H2O2. Bissaro et al. point out that H2O2 wil be generated under the reaction conditions that are normally used to assess LPMO functioality. Further work is needed to assess the validity of the various proposed LPMO mechanisms. One key challenge in such work is that LPMOs become rapidly inactivated due to oxidative damage in the catalytic center &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reported catalytic rates of LPMOs, including AA10 LPMOs,  under standard condiitons (= the presence of a reductant and O2), are remarkably low and tend to vary from 1 to 10 per minute (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Agger2014 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; MORE REFs needed?). Although not usually reported in the literature, progress curves for LPMO reactions are notoriously non-linear and there is thus little available kinetic data (see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for relatively high quality kinetic data). Importantly, it has been shown that LPMO rates can be drastically enhanced by using light &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Cannella2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; or H2O2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; to drive the LPMO reaction. In a recent detailed kinetic study of CBP21, using hydrogen peroxide to drive the reaction, Kuusk et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; determined the kcat for chitin oxidation found here to be 5.6 s-1, and concluded that the kcat/Km for H2O2-driven degradation of chitin was in the order of 106 m-1 s-1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. X) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. X) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Spam2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure Y (=Fig. 3C in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Cannella2016 pmid=27041218&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12056</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12056"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T21:06:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure Z - showing the old and the new equation). Phillips et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown on Fig. Z, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H2O2-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO to its Cu(I) state, which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O2, namely H2O2. Bissaro et al. point out that H2O2 wil be generated under the reaction conditions that are normally used to assess LPMO functioality. Further work is needed to assess the validity of the various proposed LPMO mechanisms. One key challenge in such work is that LPMOs become rapidly inactivated due to oxidative damage in the catalytic center &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetics (light)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. X) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. X) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Spam2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure Y (=Fig. 3C in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12055</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12055"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T21:02:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure Z - showing the old and the new equation). Phillips et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One challenging element of understanding how LPMOs work relates to the required delivery of two electrons to a substrate-bound enzyme whose single co-factor only allows storage of one electron. While several scenarios have been proposed, a radical and experimentally supported solution to this problem was recently proposed by Bissaro et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As shown on Fig. Z, the proposal is that hydrogen peroxide rather than molecular oxygen is the preferred co-substrate of LPMOs. The H2O2-based mechanism would only require a priming reduction of the LPMO which would then be capable of carrying out multiple catalytic cycles while having its electrons and oxygen delivered in the form of partially reduced O2, namely H2O2. Further work is needed to assess the various proposed LPMO mechanisms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetics (light)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. X) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. X) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Spam2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure Y (=Fig. 3C in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12054</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12054"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T20:52:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
UNDER CONSTRUCTION  The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure Z - showing the old and the new equation). Phillips et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known. Current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bissaro2017 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, but there are plausible alternatives that cannot be excluded, as outlined in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Beeson2015 Walton2016 Bissaro2017 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
H2O2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kinetics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. X) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. X) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Spam2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure Y (=Fig. 3C in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Beeson2015 pmid=25784051&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Walton2016 pmid=27094791&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Bertini2018 pmid=29232119&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Meier2018 pmid=29155571&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12053</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12053"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T20:46:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
**UNDER CONSTRUCTION** The catalytic mechanism of LPMOs is a matter of intense research and debate. Using labeled water and molecular oxygen, Vaaje-Kolstad et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; showed that one LPMO reaction requires two externally delivered electrons and molecular oxygen (Figure Z - showing the old and the new equation). Phillips et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Phillips2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; pointed out that hydrogen abstraction (from the C1 or the C4) by a reactive oxygen species coordinated by the copper would be followed by hydroxylation and that this would lead spontaneous cleavage of the glycosidic bond, leaving either the C1 or the C4 oxidized (yielding a lactone in equilibrium with carboxylic acid or a 4-keto group in equilibrium with a gemdiol, respectively &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). The nature of the hydrogen abstracting oxygen species is not known but current literature seems to be converging towards a Cu(II)-oxyl species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; Phillips2011 Kim2014 Bertini2018 Meier2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. X) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. X) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Spam2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure Y (=Fig. 3C in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Phillips2011 pmid=22004347&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12052</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12052"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T20:23:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. X) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. X) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Spam2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure Y (=Fig. 3C in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12051</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12051"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T20:22:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. X) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. X) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this axial position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor an effect of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate environment of the copper binding site, sometimes referred to as the second shell, shows functionally conserved features that are known from experiment to be important for catalysis (e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 Spam2017 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;). Further analysis and discussion of the roles of these residues awaits deeper insights into the catalytic mechanism of LPMOs and better assays for testing the true catalytic potential of LPMO variants. Figure Y (=Fig. 3C in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;) shows an example of such functionally conserved additional structural features and reference &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; descibes a recent mutagenesis study on an AA10, including a discussion of the many pitfalls when trying to functionally interprete mutational effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
#Span2017 pmid=28257189&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12050</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12050"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T20:14:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
Catalysis happens at the single catalytic copper ion that is coordinated by a so-called histidine brace &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (Fig. X) that is strictly conserved in all LPMOs. Originally, there was some confusion about the nature of the metal ion &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Harris2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which is due to the high copper affinity of LPMOs, which allows the enzymes to acquire copper even in the &amp;quot;absence&amp;quot; of copper. This issue was nicely settled in a seminal paper by Quinlan et al on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; and further elaborated for AA10s in subsequent publications &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The two histidines making up the histidine brace coordinate the copper in three positions that, for practical reasons are often referred to as &amp;quot;equatorial&amp;quot;. One of the histidines is the N-terminus of the mature protein and contributes with both its N-terminal amino group and a its imidazole side chain, whereas the other histidine contribute only with its side chain. In oxidized LPMOs, i.e. the Cu(II) form, the fourth equatorial position is occupied by a water &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. There are strong indications that the reactive oxygen species formed during catalysis emerges at this fourth equatorial position &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Frandsen2016 Bacik2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The final two coordination positions, often referred to as axial, vary. The proximal axial coordination site (Fig. X) is occupied by a phenylalanine or a tyrosine. The functional implications, if any, of this difference remains unknown. It should be noted that, while the hydroxyl group of the tyrosine does point towards the copper ion, the distance to the copper is too long for a strong interaction. The distal, solvent-exposed axial position tends to be occupied by a water in oxidized LPMOs and recent studies on AA9s &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016 Frandsen2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; suggest that this water will be displaced by substrate binding. The copper ion is partly shielded from the solvent in this position by a conserved alanine residue, the role of which has received considerable attention in the literature &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2 Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current data do not point at a particular effect of the presence of this alanine nor of its exact position, which varies among AA10 LPMOs. &lt;br /&gt;
More conserved feature; second shell, reson?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
#Harris2010 pmid=20230050&lt;br /&gt;
#Frandsen2016 pmid=26928935&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bacik2017 pmid=28481095&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12040</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12040"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T19:45:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs) and as carbohydrate-binding modules belonging to family CBM33. The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under construction. References &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013 Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how one was thinking about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12039</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12039"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T19:39:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs). The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under construction. References &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013 Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' is able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the title of the original publication erroneously qualified CBP21 as &amp;quot;non-catalytic&amp;quot;; this is due to how oen was think about possible substrate-disrupting effects of CBMs at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; . This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family. Oxidative cleavage of cellulose by an AA10 was demonstrated by the same group in 2011 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12038</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12038"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T19:36:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs). The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under construction. References &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013 Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. When these proteins originally were included into CAZy, they were classified as CBM33.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; . This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12037</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12037"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T19:34:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs). The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under construction. References &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013 Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and this study also provided evidence for copper being the active site metal, as had been previously shown for AA11 LPMOs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Quinlan2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. &lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; . This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
#Quinlan2011 pmid=21876164&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12035</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12035"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T19:31:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs). The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under construction. References &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013 Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and in spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. &lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; . This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12034</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12034"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T19:29:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs). The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under construction. References &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013 Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and the first structure of an LPMO The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, of which only chain C shows electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but, in retrospect this is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discrete modules: a catalytically active N-terminal AA10 module, two modules likely invovled in binding to bacterial cell walls and a C-terminal CBM5/12. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and in spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures: the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bound to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site. The first structures of AA10 LPMOs known to be active on cellulose came in 2014 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is worth noting that the oxidation state of the copper ion is affected by the reducing power of the X-ray beam as dicussed by Hemsworth et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and Gudmundsson et al &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Gudmundsson2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. &lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; . This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
#Gudmundsson2014 pmid=24828494&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12025</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12025"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T19:00:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most characterized AA10 LPMO oxidize the C1 of the scissile glycosidic bond, but some also oxidize C4 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs). The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;,''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates and potential substrates identified by binding studies include alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2012 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014 Forsbergb2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal catalytically actove AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012 Loose2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lacks the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 Vaaje-Kolstad2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds, as is substantiated by a recent study of CelS2 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under construction. References &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013 Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, which of only chain C show electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discreet modules (the N-termainl AA10 module, two modules with unkown funtion and a C-terminal CBM5/12) in addition to the N-terminal AA10 module. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and in spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures; the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bond to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. &lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; . This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2014 pmid=25109775&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2017 pmid=28086105&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12024</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12024"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:49:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs). The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolbe1998 Saito2001 Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates identified have been alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lack the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under construction. References &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013 Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, which of only chain C show electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discreet modules (the N-termainl AA10 module, two modules with unkown funtion and a C-terminal CBM5/12) in addition to the N-terminal AA10 module. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and in spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures; the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bond to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. &lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; . This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid=29222333&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2009 pmid=19348025&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12023</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12023"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:41:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs). The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolb1998 Saito2001 Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2008&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates identified have been alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2008 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lack the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under construction. References &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013 Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, which of only chain C show electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discreet modules (the N-termainl AA10 module, two modules with unkown funtion and a C-terminal CBM5/12) in addition to the N-terminal AA10 module. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and in spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures; the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bond to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. &lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; . This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid=24559135&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid= 29222333&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12022</id>
		<title>Auxiliary Activity Family 10</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Auxiliary_Activity_Family_10&amp;diff=12022"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:39:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- RESPONSIBLE CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{UnderConstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]: ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^ and ^^^Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Auxiliary Activity Family 10'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|Structurally related to [[AA9]] &amp;amp; [[AA11]] &amp;amp; [[AA13]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|lytic oxidase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|mononuclear copper ion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |{{CAZyDBlink}}AA10.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CBP21_binding_chitin_modeled.jpg|thumb|right|400px|'''Figure 1. Hypothetical representation of the interaction between CBP21 and chitin (side view, left; top view, right) that highlights how the flat surface of CBP21 might fit the flat surface of a β-chitin crystal.''' Please note that this complex has not been determined by direct experimentation nor computational molecular modelling.  The surfaces of residues known to interact with chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; are coloured magenta and the side chains of these residues are shown. In the side view some of the magenta surface is hidden by the white surface of other residues.  This picture has been adapted from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the AA10 family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases were previously classified as [[Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 33]] members). They are known to cleave chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Vaaje-Kolstad2012 Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg 2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. AA10 LPMOs are closely related to LPMOs in families AA11 and AA13, known to cleave chitin and starch, respectively.  AA10 modules often occur in combination with additional modules, in particular [[carbohydrate-binding modules]] (CBMs), but also catalytic domains such as GH18 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBMs contribute to substrate-binding and may also affect operational stability of the LPMO &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsbergb2014 Forsberg2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proteins belonging to AA10 were identified as enzymes, they were generally known as chitin binding proteins (CBPs). The reason for this was that most AA10s studied had been identified in chitinolytic systems such as that of ''Serratia marcescens'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Fuchs1986, Suzuki1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, several ''Streptomyces'' species &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zeltins1997 Kolb1998 Saito2001 Chu2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Vibrio cholerae'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, ''Pseudomonas aeruginosa'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Folders2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and ''Lacotococcus lactis'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2008&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Upon their characterization no other function than substrate binding could be identified, thus the name &amp;quot;chitin binding protein&amp;quot; was coined. Substrates identified have been alpha-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolbe1998 Zeltins1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, beta-chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Suzuki1998 Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, both the alpha- and beta-chitin allomorphs &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Chu2001 Vaaje-Kolstad2008 Vaaje-Kolstad2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; chitosan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Saito2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Walter2008 Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and even bacterial and eptihelial cell surfaces where the binding interaction substrate has been suggested to be GlcNAc containing glycoproteins or proteoglycans &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sanches2011 Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. It should be noted that studies on AA10s prior to their identification as copper-dependent metalloenzymes were conducted in the absence of Cu(II), which may have had influence on the binding affinity and specificity of the enzyme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously noted, AA10s exist both as single module entities and in multimodular forms. CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' and EfCBM33A from ''E. faecalis'' are catalytically functional single-module AA10s that both bind well to chitin (CBP21 is specific for beta-chitin, whereas EfCBM33A binds to both alpha and beta-chitin). The cellulose targeting AA10 from ''S. coelicolor'' (CelS2) on the other hand, is bimodular and contains a cellulose binding CBM2 in addition to the catalytic AA10 module &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The V. cholerae AA10 is an elongated tetra-modular protein where the N-terminal AA10 module binds mucin, the two following modules bind bacterial cell walls and the C-terminal CBM5/12 bind chitin &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The substrate binding surface of AA10s is flat and lack the typical arrangement of aromatic amino acids that is common for carbohydrate binding proteins. It is therefore thought that substrate binding is predominantly mediated by hydrogen bonds. The flat substrate binding surface seems optimal for binding the flat surface of crystalline carbohydrate structures like cellulose and chitin (Fig. 1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Content is to be added here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues and copper coordination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under construction. References &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010 Aachmann2012 Hemsworth2013 Hemsworth2013-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the structure CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was solved and represents the first structure in the AA10 family [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The CBP21 wild type structure has three molecules in the asymetric unit, which of only chain C show electron density for a metal bound in the metal binding motif (modeled as a sodium ion, but is probably a reduced copper ion with low occupancy). Later the same year the structure of the CBP21-Y54A mutant was solved (different crystal form and space group), showing two molecules in the asymetric unit with no trace of electron density for a metal ion bound in the active site [{{PDBlink}}2ben 2BEN] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The second AA10 structure, one of two AA10 from ''Burkholderia pseudomallei'' 1710b (Uniprot ID: Q3JY22), was published in the PDB late in 2011 by Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease [{{PDBlink}}3uam 3UAM]. The structure contains five molecules in the asymetric unit that all have two amino acids from the signal peptide still attached to the N-terminus, most likely disrupting the active site.  The third unique AA10 structure to be solved was GbpA from ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961 [{{PDBlink}}2xwx 2XWX] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Wong2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. GbpA is unique in the sense that it contains four discreet modules (the N-termainl AA10 module, two modules with unkown funtion and a C-terminal CBM5/12) in addition to the N-terminal AA10 module. The published structure of GbpA only lacks the C-termainal CBM5/12 and is thus the first multimodular AA10 structure to be published. Shortly after the release of the GbpA, the structure of EfCBM33A from ''Enterococcus faecalis'' [{{PDBlink}}4a02 4A02] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Vaaje-Kolstad2011&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; was published. The structure of EfCBM33A was solved at very high resolution (0.95Å), but similar to the other structures solved, no metal ion was observed bound in the active site. In 2012 the solution structure of CBP21 wild type (apo-form) was solved by NMR  [{{PDBlink}}2lhs 2LHS] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Aachmann2012&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and in spring 2013 the structure of the single AA10 harbored by''Bacillus amyloliquefaciens'' DSM7 (BaCBM33) was published &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;,Hemsworth2013&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The latter publication contained three structures; the apo-enzyme [{{PDBlink}}2yow 2YOW] and two structures containing a reduced copper ion bond to the active site [{{PDBlink}}2yoy 2YOY][{{PDBlink}}2yox 2YOX], thus being the first AA10 structures with the copper ion (that is essential for activity) bound in the active site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First AA10 protein identified: The first proteins studied from the AA10 family were all isolated and cloned from various ''Streptomyces'' strains, a major effort carried out by the Schrempf group of Osnabrück University. The first family AA10 protein to be isolated and characterized was CHB1 from ''Streptomyces olivaceoviridis'' a study published in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Schnellman1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. CHB1 was shown to bind strongly to alpha-chitin and was also observed to bind to fungal hyphae. &lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of synergy between AA10 and canonical glycoside hydrolases: In 2005, Vaaje-Kolstad and co-workers showed that CBP21 from ''S. marcescens'' was able to increase the rate of chitin hydrolysis by a variety of chitinases, including all three ''S. marsescens'' GH18 chitinases and a GH19 chitinase from ''Streptomyces coelicolor'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First demonstration of oxidative cleavage by an AA10 protein: Catalysis of lytic oxidation of a glycosidic bond by an AA10 enzyme was first shown for CBP21 in 2010, where oxidative cleavage of chitin was demonstrated &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; . This finding also represents the first demonstration of LPMO activity, regardless of AA family.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: CBP21, the single AA10-type LPMO from the Gram negative bacterium ''Serratia marcescens'', PDB ID [{{PDBlink}}2bem 2BEM].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-1 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005-2 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Aachmann2012 pmid=23112164&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2012 pmid=22210154&lt;br /&gt;
#Wong2012 pmid=22253590&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013 pmid=23540833&lt;br /&gt;
#Fuchs1986 pmid=16347012&lt;br /&gt;
#Suzuki1998 pmid=9501524&lt;br /&gt;
#Walter2008 pmid=18438642&lt;br /&gt;
#Chu2001 pmid=11429457&lt;br /&gt;
#Saito2001 pmid=11229920&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolbe1998 pmid=9611804&lt;br /&gt;
#Zeltins1997 pmid=9208950&lt;br /&gt;
#Folders2000 pmid=10671445&lt;br /&gt;
#Sanches2011 pmid=21131525&lt;br /&gt;
#Hemsworth2013-2 pmid=23769965&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2012 pmid=22747961&lt;br /&gt;
#Schnellman1994 pmid=7815940&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid= 24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsbergb2014 pmid= 24559135&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2018 pmid= 29222333&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Auxiliary Activity Families|AA010]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12021</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12021"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:27:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ([http://www.cazy.org/AA10.html AA family 10]) after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family AA10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe activity of AA9 LPMOs ([http://www.cazy.org/AA11.html AA family 11]) on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014 Borisova2015&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of both AA9 and AA10, addressing topics such as substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Borisova2015 pmid=26178376&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12020</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12020"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:26:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ([http://www.cazy.org/AA10.html AA family 10]) after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family AA10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe activity of AA9 LPMOs ([http://www.cazy.org/AA11.html AA family 11]) on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014 Borisova2015&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of both AA9 and AA10, addressing topics such as substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; test.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Borisova2015 pmid=26178376&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2018 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12019</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12019"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:25:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ([http://www.cazy.org/AA10.html AA family 10]) after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family AA10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe activity of AA9 LPMOs ([http://www.cazy.org/AA11.html AA family 11]) on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014 Borisova2015&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of both AA9 and AA10, addressing topics such as substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; test.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Borisova2015 pmid=26178376&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2017 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12018</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12018"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:24:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ([http://www.cazy.org/AA10.html AA family 10]) after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family AA10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe activity of AA9 LPMOs ([http://www.cazy.org/AA11.html AA family 11]) on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014 Borisova2015&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of both AA9 and AA10, addressing topics such as substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Borisova2015 pmid=26178376&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2017 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12017</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12017"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:23:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ([http://www.cazy.org/AA10.html AA family 10]) after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family AA10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe activity of AA9 LPMOs ([http://www.cazy.org/AA11.html AA family 11]) on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014 Borisova2015&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of both AA9 and AA10, addressing topics such as substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Borisova2015 pmid=26178376&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2017 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12016</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12016"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:22:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ([http://www.cazy.org/AA10.html AA family 10]) after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family AA10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Westereng2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe activity of AA9 LPMOs ([http://www.cazy.org/AA11.html AA family 11]) on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014 Borisova2015&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of both AA9 and AA10, addressing topics such as substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Borisova2015 pmid=26178376&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2017 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12015</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12015"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:22:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; ([http://www.cazy.org/AA10.html AA family 10])after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family AA10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Westereng2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe activity of AA9 LPMOs ([http://www.cazy.org/AA11.html AA family 11]) on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014 Borisova2015&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of both AA9 and AA10, addressing topics such as substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Borisova2015 pmid=26178376&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2017 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12014</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12014"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:16:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family AA10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe LPMO activity on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2017 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12013</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12013"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:14:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family 10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe LPMO activity on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=21748815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2017 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12012</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12012"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:13:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family 10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe LPMO activity on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929773&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=2178815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2017 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12011</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12011"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T18:11:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The Eijsink group is probably best known for the discovery of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in 2010 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; after originally having detected chitinase boosting activity of what we now know is a chitin-active family 10 LPMO in 2005 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Vaaje-Kolstad2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The group demonstrated AA10 activity on cellulose &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Forsberg2011 Forsberg2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and was the first to describe LPMO activity on soluble substrates &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Isaksen2014&amp;gt; and beta-glucan hemicelluloses &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Agger2014&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent developments include studies of substrate-binding &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Courtade2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, LPMO activation &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Loose2016&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, and the involvement of hydrogen peroxide in LPMO action &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bissaro2017 Kuusk2018&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2010 pmid=20929778&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2011 pmid=2178815&lt;br /&gt;
#Forsberg2014 pmid=24912171&lt;br /&gt;
#Isaksen2014 pmid=24324265&lt;br /&gt;
#Agger2014 pmid=24733907&lt;br /&gt;
#Courtade2016 pmid=27152023&lt;br /&gt;
#Loose2016 pmid=27643617&lt;br /&gt;
#Bissaro2017 pmid=28846668&lt;br /&gt;
#Kuusk2017 pmid=29138240&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12010</id>
		<title>User:Vincent Eijsink</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=User:Vincent_Eijsink&amp;diff=12010"/>
		<updated>2018-01-15T17:57:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Vincent_Bilde.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Vincent Eijsink obtained an MSc in Molecular Sciences (Biochemistry) from Wageningen University and completed his PhD at the Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute under the supervision of Gerard Venema in 1991. During his Ph.D. studies, focusing on the engineering of protein stability, he was co-supervised by Herman Berendsen, Bauke Dijkstra and Gert Vriend and he had several short stays in the Bioinformatics group at EMBL. In 1993, he moved to what is now called the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), in Ås, Norway, where he became a full professor of Biochemistry in 1997. Work on CAZymes started off with work on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] in the late 1990s, resulting in several papers on the structure and function of these enzymes &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;VanAalten2000 VanAalten2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Current chitin-related work focuses on [http://www.cazy.org/GH18.html family 18 chitinases] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006 Zakariassen2009 Vaaje-Kolstad2013 &amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and family 19 chitinases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hoell2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, whereas the group has a growing interest and activity in chitin deacetylases ([http://www.cazy.org/CE4.html CE family 4]) &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Liu2017 Tuveng2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Recent research includes CAZyme discovery &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Pope2012 Larsbrink2016 Tuvengb2017&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Another research focus concerns proteins belonging to [http://www.cazy.org/CBM33.html CBM family 33] that facilitate degradation of crystalline polymeric substrates such as chitin by glycoside hydrolases &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Kolstad2005 Kolstadb2005 Kolstad2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2000 pmid=10823940&lt;br /&gt;
#VanAalten2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006 pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Vaaje-Kolstad2013 pmid=23398882&lt;br /&gt;
#Hoell2006 pmid=17010167&lt;br /&gt;
#Liu2017 pmid=28496100&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuveng2017 pmid=29107991&lt;br /&gt;
#Pope2012 pmid=22701672&lt;br /&gt;
#Larsbrink2016 pmid=27933102&lt;br /&gt;
#Tuvengb2017 pmid=27169553&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolstad2005 pmid=15590674&lt;br /&gt;
#Kolstadb2005 pmid=15929981&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contributors|Eijsink, Vincent]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6059</id>
		<title>Glycoside Hydrolase Family 18</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6059"/>
		<updated>2010-11-10T13:46:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{CuratorApproved}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]s: ^^^Gideon Davies^^^, ^^^Nathalie Juge^^^, ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Gideon Davies^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH18'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|GH-K&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|retaining&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|known (acid/neighbouring group)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH18.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Family GH18 is unusual in having [[glycoside hydrolases]] that are both catalytically active chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.96) and also sub-families of non-hydrolytic proteins that function as carbohydrate binding modules / &amp;quot;lectins&amp;quot; or as xylanase inhibitors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active chitinases comprise non-processive endo-acting enzymes as well as processive enzymes with exo- and endo-binding preferences &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a,Hult2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most enzymes primarily produce chitobiose, but some endo-acting family 18 chitinases are not capable to cleave trimers or tetramers and thus yield longer products. Note that in older literature the endo-/exo-character of these enzymes often is assessed by studying the degradation of oligomeric substrates, and that several recent studies have shown this method to be invalid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Family 18 chitinases break down all forms of chitin at varying rates depending on the enzyme and the substrate. They also act on chitosan with degrees of acetylation as low as 13 % &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sorbotten2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and some are known to degrade peptidoglycan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Studies on family 18 chitinases from ''Serratia marcescens'' have suggested that most subsites for sugar binding show some promiscuity with the notable exception of subsite -1 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
GH18 enzymes perform enzymic catalysis with [[retaining|retention]] of anomeric configuration. They belong to a growing group of enzymes (now including  GH families 18, [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 20|20]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 25|25]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 56|56]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 84|84]], and [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 85|85]]) that perform catalysis using a double-displacement reaction but instead of the more common enzyme-derived nucleophile they utilize the ''N''-acetamido carbonyl oxygen in what is termed [[neighboring group participation]] (or substrate participation or anchimeric assistance). Figures showing such a mechanism date back to Koshland's 1953 review &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Koshland1953&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;; indeed they frequent the chemical literature of participating groups long before that, but it is primarily through the work on GH18 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and soon after [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996,Armand1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; that such a mechanism became well established. In such a mechanism, which occurs with (net) retention of anomeric configuration, the enzyme provides a [[general acid]] function to protonate the leaving group to facilitate its departure with the substrate carbonyl oxygen playing the role of nucleophile to generate a bicyclic &amp;quot;[[oxazolinium ion]]&amp;quot; [[intermediate]], which subsequently breaks down following the microscopic reverse ''via'' hydrolysis or occasionally transglycosylation).  Such a mechanism has a number of facets, one of which is its potential inhibition using thiazolines &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Macdonald&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Allosamidin, a pseudotrisaccharide consisting of two ''N''-acetylallosamine sugars linked to an allosamizoline moiety &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sakuda1987&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is a well known natural compound that is a high affinity inhibitor of family 18 chitinases (see Figure).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ligands.PNG|thumb|right|300px|'''Trisaccharide oxazolinium ion intermediate (upper panel), allosamidin (middle panel), and trisaccharide thiazoline (lower panel).''']] Like in many other enzymes acting on polysaccharides the substrate-binding clefts of processive family 18 chitinases are lined with aromatic residues. Family 18 chitinases have proven very useful to gain insight into the structural basis of a processive mechanism and in the importance of such a mechanism for biomass-converting efficiency &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Eijsink2008,Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As previously suggested for cellulases in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Varrot2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, aromatic residues close to the catalytic center play a crucial role in processivity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006b&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytically-active GH18 enzymes use a double displacement reaction mechanism with [[neighboring group participation]](see Figure). In this mechanism the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate acts as a nucleophile, with assistance from a carboxylate (Asp) that acts to deprotonate the ''N''-acetamido nitrogen during [[oxazolinium ion]] formation/breakdown. A second catalytic acid residue (glutamate in family GH18, but often also Asp in other families using this mechanism, except for [[GH85]] where this residue is an amide) acts as a general acid/base to protonate the glycosidic oxygen to assist in the departure of the aglycon, and to deprotonate the nucleophilic water molecule during the hydrolysis of the [[oxazolinium ion]] [[intermediate]].  In family GH18 the two catalytic carboxylates are found in an D-X-E motif whereas in other families the carboxylates may be adjacent, such as the DD motif in family [[GH84]] (for example see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).  The physical separation of the two catalytic residues (with the second not in a position to act as a nucleophile itself) has led to confusion in some literature that GH18 and other enzymes (notably [[GH25]]) may be inverting enzymes; this is certainly not the case for GH18 and is unlikely to be the case for [[GH25]].[[Image:mechanism.jpg|thumb|right|600px|'''Catalytic mechanism of family 18 chitinases.''' The picture shows the mechanism proposed for ChiB from ''Serratia marcescens''. Panel c shows the oxazolium ion intermediate which is to be hydrolyzed by an incoming water molecule. The picture is taken from&amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D-X-E motif (Asp140-Glu144 in the Figure) is part of a diagnostic D-X-X-''D''-X-D-X-E motif that includes two more aspartates of which the one in italics (Asp140 in the Figure) is known to be essential for catalytic activity. There are several other conserved residues in the catalytic center that play important roles during catalysis, related to distortion of the -1 sugar, activation of the acetamido group and/or cycling of the p''K''a of the catalytic glutamate &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Synstad2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The O6 of the –1 sugar interacts with the side chain of yet another semi-conserved aspartate (Asp215 in the Figure). In enzymes with an acidic pH optimum this residue is an asparagine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Catalytically inactive members ===&lt;br /&gt;
One unusual of feature of plant members of the GH18 family is the large number of sequences that encode catalytically-inactive proteins that function as enzyme inhibitors or lectins. Phylogenetic analysis of the plant GH18 family reveals clear distinction between hevamine-type chitinases, putative chitinases and narbonins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Durand2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Out of the major subfamilies, only the one that contains hevamine contains enzymes of demonstrated activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The subfamily of GH18 that contains xylanase inhibitor proteins (XIP) emerged from the hevamine cluster along with concanavalin B. All have non-conservative substitutions of one of the acidic amino acid residues in the catalytic region. In the structure of concanavalin B the catalytic Glu residue is replaced by Gln &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Henniga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which mostly accounts for the lack of chitinase activity reported for this protein. The XIP-type inhibitors all have the third aspartic acid DxxDxDxE mutated into an aromatic residue whereas the catalytic glutamate residue is only conserved in the prototype of cereal xylanase inhibitors, XIP-I (isolated from ''Triticum aetivum'') &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In XIP-I and narbonin, the glutamic acid residues are present in an equivalent position to the catalytic residue in hevamine, but their side chain is fully engaged in salt bridges with neighbouring arginine residues &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, preventing chitinase activity despite the presence of the catalytic residue. Furthermore in both XIP-I and narbonin, the position equivalent to residue Asp in hevamine, which has been proposed to stabilize the positively charged [[oxazolinium ion]] reaction [[intermediate]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is occupied by a bulky residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The mutation of this Asp residue in alanine in hevamine led to a mutant with approx. 2% residual activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The most striking disruption of the cleft in XIP-I and narbonin is caused by the mutation of subsite -1 Gly which participates in the hydrogen-bonding network with the ligand &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;ATVA1 TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, resulting in complete obstruction of subsite -1 and preventing access to the catalytic residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Xylanase inhibitors appeared after the emergence of the various subfamilies of chitinases from their common ancestor. In this respect, the xylanase inhibitors are a relatively new acquisition, and so far no protein has been reported to display both xylanase inhibition and chitinase activities. GH18 XIP-type inhibitors can inhibit xylanases from [[GH10]] and [[GH11]] families &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The inhibition specificity of the GH18 xylanase inhibitors can be explained on the basis of the solved 3-D structure of XIP-I in complex with a [[GH10]] xylanase from ''A. nidulans'' and a [[GH11]] xylanase from ''P. funiculosum'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FIGURE ChiA_ChiB.jpg|thumb|right|500px|'''Structures of ChiA (left) and ChiB (right) from ''Serratia marcescens''.''' Panels A and B show C-alpha traces of the complete two-domain enzymes, with a substrate-binding non-catalytic domain pointing to the upper left (A) or lower right (B). The side chains of aromatic residues (possibly) involved in polysaccharide binding are shown in dark blue, whereas the side chain of the acid/base catalytic glutamate is shown in green. Panel C shows details of ChiA in complex with an chito-octamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1ehn 1ehn]) and panel D shows details of ChiB in complex with a chito-pentamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1e6n 1e6n]). Subsites are numbered. This picture was taken from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although these enzymes are frequently multi-modular, the catalytic domains are &amp;amp;alpha; / &amp;amp;beta; barrels &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. While several structures for complete bi-modular chitinases are available &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,Aalten2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (see Figure), available structural information for multi-modular enzymes is often limited to the isolated catalytic domain.&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the conformational itinerary of catalysis which is extremely similar to other [[retaining]] enzymes active on ''gluco''-configured substrates, was provided by the van Aalten group &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; in 2001 through the trapping of a distorted Michaelis complex in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1,4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''B'' conformation and thus extremely similar to the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''S''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; skew boats observed in [[GH5]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Davies1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for example or the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;E conformation originally seen for a &amp;quot;neighboring group&amp;quot; enzyme in [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. More recently, a similar conformation has been observed for the Michaelis complex of another neighboring group enzyme, the [[GH84]] O-GlcNAcase &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Fungal GH18 enzymes are considered as possible therapeutic targets and a number of programmes are probing this area (for example &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Housten2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First sterochemistry determination: Sometimes '''incorrectly''' reported as inverting, this family performs catalysis with '''retention''' of anomeric configuration as first shown on the ''Bacillus ciculans'' enzyme &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Armand1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[catalytic nucleophile]] identification: This family is one of many that uses neighbouring group participation for catalysis with the N-acetyl carbonyl group acting as the nucleophile; first proposed (we believe) for this family in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[general acid/base]] residue identification: On the basis of 3-D structure &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: The first two 3-D structures for catalytically active GH18 members were  the ''Serratia marcescens'' chitinase A and the plant defence protein hevamine published &amp;quot;back-to-back&amp;quot; in ''Structure'' in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  In retrospect, however, the non-catalytic &amp;quot;narbonin&amp;quot; structure was arguably the first GH18 3-D structure, although it is has no enzymatic activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennig1993&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Perrakis pmid=7704527&lt;br /&gt;
#ATVA1 pmid=7704528&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1994 pmid=8168626&lt;br /&gt;
#Koshland1953  Koshland, D. (1953) Biol. Rev. 28, 416.&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1997 pmid=9396742&lt;br /&gt;
#Housten2002 pmid=12093900&lt;br /&gt;
#Tews1996 pmid=8673609&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Macdonald pmid=20209544&lt;br /&gt;
#He2010 pmid=20067256&lt;br /&gt;
#Davies1998 pmid=9718293&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2003   pmid=12775711&lt;br /&gt;
#Henniga1995 pmid=7490746&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennig1993 pmid=1628747&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennigb1995 pmid=15299319&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1996 pmid=8831791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma2002 pmid=11846790&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2003 pmid=12617724&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2004 pmid=15181003&lt;br /&gt;
#Juge2004 pmid=14871661&lt;br /&gt;
#Durand2005 pmid=15794761&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1995 pmid=7495789&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006a pmid=16420473&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006b pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Sorbotten2005 pmid=15654891&lt;br /&gt;
#Varrot2003 pmid=12842048&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma1997 pmid=9271197&lt;br /&gt;
#Eijsink2008 pmid=18367275&lt;br /&gt;
#Hult2005 pmid=15717865&lt;br /&gt;
#Aalten2000 pmid=7675786&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Synstad2004 pmid=14717693&lt;br /&gt;
#Sakuda1987 pmid=3570982&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Glycoside Hydrolase Families|GH018]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=File:Ligands.PNG&amp;diff=6058</id>
		<title>File:Ligands.PNG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=File:Ligands.PNG&amp;diff=6058"/>
		<updated>2010-11-10T13:46:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6056</id>
		<title>Glycoside Hydrolase Family 18</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6056"/>
		<updated>2010-11-09T14:24:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{CuratorApproved}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]s: ^^^Gideon Davies^^^, ^^^Nathalie Juge^^^, ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Gideon Davies^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH18'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|GH-K&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|retaining&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|known (acid/neighbouring group)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH18.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Family GH18 is unusual in having [[glycoside hydrolases]] that are both catalytically active chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.96) and also sub-families of non-hydrolytic proteins that function as carbohydrate binding modules / &amp;quot;lectins&amp;quot; or as xylanase inhibitors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active chitinases comprise non-processive endo-acting enzymes as well as processive enzymes with exo- and endo-binding preferences &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a,Hult2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most enzymes primarily produce chitobiose, but some endo-acting family 18 chitinases are not capable to cleave trimers or tetramers and thus yield longer products. Note that in older literature the endo-/exo-character of these enzymes often is assessed by studying the degradation of oligomeric substrates, and that several recent studies have shown this method to be invalid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Family 18 chitinases break down all forms of chitin at varying rates depending on the enzyme and the substrate. They also act on chitosan with degrees of acetylation as low as 13 % &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sorbotten2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and some are known to degrade peptidoglycan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Studies on family 18 chitinases from ''Serratia marcescens'' have suggested that most subsites for sugar binding show some promiscuity with the notable exception of subsite -1 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
GH18 enzymes perform enzymic catalysis with [[retaining|retention]] of anomeric configuration. They belong to a growing group of enzymes (now including  GH families 18, [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 20|20]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 25|25]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 56|56]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 84|84]], and [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 85|85]]) that perform catalysis using a double-displacement reaction but instead of the more common enzyme-derived nucleophile they utilize the ''N''-acetamido carbonyl oxygen in what is termed [[neighboring group participation]] (or substrate participation or anchimeric assistance). Figures showing such a mechanism date back to Koshland's 1953 review &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Koshland1953&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;; indeed they frequent the chemical literature of participating groups long before that, but it is primarily through the work on GH18 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and soon after [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996,Armand1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; that such a mechanism became well established. In such a mechanism, which occurs with (net) retention of anomeric configuration, the enzyme provides a [[general acid]] function to protonate the leaving group to facilitate its departure with the substrate carbonyl oxygen playing the role of nucleophile to generate a bicyclic &amp;quot;[[oxazolinium ion]]&amp;quot; [[intermediate]], which subsequently breaks down following the microscopic reverse ''via'' hydrolysis or occasionally transglycosylation).  Such a mechanism has a number of facets, one of which is its potential inhibition using thiazolines &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Macdonald&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Allosamidin, a pseudotrisaccharide consisting of two ''N''-acetylallosamine sugars linked to an allosamizoline moiety &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sakuda1987&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is a well known natural compound that is a high affinity inhibitor of family 18 chitinases (see Figure).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ligand_structures.PNG|thumb|right|300px|'''Trisaccharide oxazolinium ion intermediate (upper panel), allosamidin (middle panel), and trisaccharide thiazoline (lower panel).''']] Like in many other enzymes acting on polysaccharides the substrate-binding clefts of processive family 18 chitinases are lined with aromatic residues. Family 18 chitinases have proven very useful to gain insight into the structural basis of a processive mechanism and in the importance of such a mechanism for biomass-converting efficiency &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Eijsink2008,Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As previously suggested for cellulases in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Varrot2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, aromatic residues close to the catalytic center play a crucial role in processivity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006b&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytically-active GH18 enzymes use a double displacement reaction mechanism with [[neighboring group participation]](see Figure). In this mechanism the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate acts as a nucleophile, with assistance from a carboxylate (Asp) that acts to deprotonate the ''N''-acetamido nitrogen during [[oxazolinium ion]] formation/breakdown. A second catalytic acid residue (glutamate in family GH18, but often also Asp in other families using this mechanism, except for [[GH85]] where this residue is an amide) acts as a general acid/base to protonate the glycosidic oxygen to assist in the departure of the aglycon, and to deprotonate the nucleophilic water molecule during the hydrolysis of the [[oxazolinium ion]] [[intermediate]].  In family GH18 the two catalytic carboxylates are found in an D-X-E motif whereas in other families the carboxylates may be adjacent, such as the DD motif in family [[GH84]] (for example see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).  The physical separation of the two catalytic residues (with the second not in a position to act as a nucleophile itself) has led to confusion in some literature that GH18 and other enzymes (notably [[GH25]]) may be inverting enzymes; this is certainly not the case for GH18 and is unlikely to be the case for [[GH25]].[[Image:mechanism.jpg|thumb|right|600px|'''Catalytic mechanism of family 18 chitinases.''' The picture shows the mechanism proposed for ChiB from ''Serratia marcescens''. Panel c shows the oxazolium ion intermediate which is to be hydrolyzed by an incoming water molecule. The picture is taken from&amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D-X-E motif (Asp140-Glu144 in the Figure) is part of a diagnostic D-X-X-''D''-X-D-X-E motif that includes two more aspartates of which the one in italics (Asp140 in the Figure) is known to be essential for catalytic activity. There are several other conserved residues in the catalytic center that play important roles during catalysis, related to distortion of the -1 sugar, activation of the acetamido group and/or cycling of the p''K''a of the catalytic glutamate &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Synstad2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The O6 of the –1 sugar interacts with the side chain of yet another semi-conserved aspartate (Asp215 in the Figure). In enzymes with an acidic pH optimum this residue is an asparagine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Catalytically inactive members ===&lt;br /&gt;
One unusual of feature of plant members of the GH18 family is the large number of sequences that encode catalytically-inactive proteins that function as enzyme inhibitors or lectins. Phylogenetic analysis of the plant GH18 family reveals clear distinction between hevamine-type chitinases, putative chitinases and narbonins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Durand2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Out of the major subfamilies, only the one that contains hevamine contains enzymes of demonstrated activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The subfamily of GH18 that contains xylanase inhibitor proteins (XIP) emerged from the hevamine cluster along with concanavalin B. All have non-conservative substitutions of one of the acidic amino acid residues in the catalytic region. In the structure of concanavalin B the catalytic Glu residue is replaced by Gln &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Henniga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which mostly accounts for the lack of chitinase activity reported for this protein. The XIP-type inhibitors all have the third aspartic acid DxxDxDxE mutated into an aromatic residue whereas the catalytic glutamate residue is only conserved in the prototype of cereal xylanase inhibitors, XIP-I (isolated from ''Triticum aetivum'') &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In XIP-I and narbonin, the glutamic acid residues are present in an equivalent position to the catalytic residue in hevamine, but their side chain is fully engaged in salt bridges with neighbouring arginine residues &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, preventing chitinase activity despite the presence of the catalytic residue. Furthermore in both XIP-I and narbonin, the position equivalent to residue Asp in hevamine, which has been proposed to stabilize the positively charged [[oxazolinium ion]] reaction [[intermediate]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is occupied by a bulky residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The mutation of this Asp residue in alanine in hevamine led to a mutant with approx. 2% residual activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The most striking disruption of the cleft in XIP-I and narbonin is caused by the mutation of subsite -1 Gly which participates in the hydrogen-bonding network with the ligand &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;ATVA1 TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, resulting in complete obstruction of subsite -1 and preventing access to the catalytic residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Xylanase inhibitors appeared after the emergence of the various subfamilies of chitinases from their common ancestor. In this respect, the xylanase inhibitors are a relatively new acquisition, and so far no protein has been reported to display both xylanase inhibition and chitinase activities. GH18 XIP-type inhibitors can inhibit xylanases from [[GH10]] and [[GH11]] families &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The inhibition specificity of the GH18 xylanase inhibitors can be explained on the basis of the solved 3-D structure of XIP-I in complex with a [[GH10]] xylanase from ''A. nidulans'' and a [[GH11]] xylanase from ''P. funiculosum'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FIGURE ChiA_ChiB.jpg|thumb|right|500px|'''Structures of ChiA (left) and ChiB (right) from ''Serratia marcescens''.''' Panels A and B show C-alpha traces of the complete two-domain enzymes, with a substrate-binding non-catalytic domain pointing to the upper left (A) or lower right (B). The side chains of aromatic residues (possibly) involved in polysaccharide binding are shown in dark blue, whereas the side chain of the acid/base catalytic glutamate is shown in green. Panel C shows details of ChiA in complex with an chito-octamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1ehn 1ehn]) and panel D shows details of ChiB in complex with a chito-pentamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1e6n 1e6n]). Subsites are numbered. This picture was taken from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although these enzymes are frequently multi-modular, the catalytic domains are &amp;amp;alpha; / &amp;amp;beta; barrels &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. While several structures for complete bi-modular chitinases are available &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,Aalten2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (see Figure), available structural information for multi-modular enzymes is often limited to the isolated catalytic domain.&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the conformational itinerary of catalysis which is extremely similar to other [[retaining]] enzymes active on ''gluco''-configured substrates, was provided by the van Aalten group &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; in 2001 through the trapping of a distorted Michaelis complex in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1,4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''B'' conformation and thus extremely similar to the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''S''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; skew boats observed in [[GH5]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Davies1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for example or the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;E conformation originally seen for a &amp;quot;neighboring group&amp;quot; enzyme in [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. More recently, a similar conformation has been observed for the Michaelis complex of another neighboring group enzyme, the [[GH84]] O-GlcNAcase &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Fungal GH18 enzymes are considered as possible therapeutic targets and a number of programmes are probing this area (for example &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Housten2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First sterochemistry determination: Sometimes '''incorrectly''' reported as inverting, this family performs catalysis with '''retention''' of anomeric configuration as first shown on the ''Bacillus ciculans'' enzyme &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Armand1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[catalytic nucleophile]] identification: This family is one of many that uses neighbouring group participation for catalysis with the N-acetyl carbonyl group acting as the nucleophile; first proposed (we believe) for this family in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[general acid/base]] residue identification: On the basis of 3-D structure &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: The first two 3-D structures for catalytically active GH18 members were  the ''Serratia marcescens'' chitinase A and the plant defence protein hevamine published &amp;quot;back-to-back&amp;quot; in ''Structure'' in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  In retrospect, however, the non-catalytic &amp;quot;narbonin&amp;quot; structure was arguably the first GH18 3-D structure, although it is has no enzymatic activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennig1993&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Perrakis pmid=7704527&lt;br /&gt;
#ATVA1 pmid=7704528&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1994 pmid=8168626&lt;br /&gt;
#Koshland1953  Koshland, D. (1953) Biol. Rev. 28, 416.&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1997 pmid=9396742&lt;br /&gt;
#Housten2002 pmid=12093900&lt;br /&gt;
#Tews1996 pmid=8673609&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Macdonald pmid=20209544&lt;br /&gt;
#He2010 pmid=20067256&lt;br /&gt;
#Davies1998 pmid=9718293&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2003   pmid=12775711&lt;br /&gt;
#Henniga1995 pmid=7490746&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennig1993 pmid=1628747&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennigb1995 pmid=15299319&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1996 pmid=8831791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma2002 pmid=11846790&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2003 pmid=12617724&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2004 pmid=15181003&lt;br /&gt;
#Juge2004 pmid=14871661&lt;br /&gt;
#Durand2005 pmid=15794761&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1995 pmid=7495789&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006a pmid=16420473&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006b pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Sorbotten2005 pmid=15654891&lt;br /&gt;
#Varrot2003 pmid=12842048&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma1997 pmid=9271197&lt;br /&gt;
#Eijsink2008 pmid=18367275&lt;br /&gt;
#Hult2005 pmid=15717865&lt;br /&gt;
#Aalten2000 pmid=7675786&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Synstad2004 pmid=14717693&lt;br /&gt;
#Sakuda1987 pmid=3570982&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Glycoside Hydrolase Families|GH018]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6055</id>
		<title>Glycoside Hydrolase Family 18</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6055"/>
		<updated>2010-11-09T14:23:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{CuratorApproved}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]s: ^^^Gideon Davies^^^, ^^^Nathalie Juge^^^, ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Gideon Davies^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH18'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|GH-K&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|retaining&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|known (acid/neighbouring group)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH18.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Family GH18 is unusual in having [[glycoside hydrolases]] that are both catalytically active chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.96) and also sub-families of non-hydrolytic proteins that function as carbohydrate binding modules / &amp;quot;lectins&amp;quot; or as xylanase inhibitors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active chitinases comprise non-processive endo-acting enzymes as well as processive enzymes with exo- and endo-binding preferences &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a,Hult2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most enzymes primarily produce chitobiose, but some endo-acting family 18 chitinases are not capable to cleave trimers or tetramers and thus yield longer products. Note that in older literature the endo-/exo-character of these enzymes often is assessed by studying the degradation of oligomeric substrates, and that several recent studies have shown this method to be invalid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Family 18 chitinases break down all forms of chitin at varying rates depending on the enzyme and the substrate. They also act on chitosan with degrees of acetylation as low as 13 % &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sorbotten2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and some are known to degrade peptidoglycan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Studies on family 18 chitinases from ''Serratia marcescens'' have suggested that most subsites for sugar binding show some promiscuity with the notable exception of subsite -1 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
GH18 enzymes perform enzymic catalysis with [[retaining|retention]] of anomeric configuration. They belong to a growing group of enzymes (now including  GH families 18, [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 20|20]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 25|25]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 56|56]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 84|84]], and [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 85|85]]) that perform catalysis using a double-displacement reaction but instead of the more common enzyme-derived nucleophile they utilize the ''N''-acetamido carbonyl oxygen in what is termed [[neighboring group participation]] (or substrate participation or anchimeric assistance). Figures showing such a mechanism date back to Koshland's 1953 review &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Koshland1953&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;; indeed they frequent the chemical literature of participating groups long before that, but it is primarily through the work on GH18 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and soon after [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996,Armand1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; that such a mechanism became well established. In such a mechanism, which occurs with (net) retention of anomeric configuration, the enzyme provides a [[general acid]] function to protonate the leaving group to facilitate its departure with the substrate carbonyl oxygen playing the role of nucleophile to generate a bicyclic &amp;quot;[[oxazolinium ion]]&amp;quot; [[intermediate]], which subsequently breaks down following the microscopic reverse ''via'' hydrolysis or occasionally transglycosylation).  Such a mechanism has a number of facets, one of which is its potential inhibition using thiazolines &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Macdonald&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Allosamidin, a pseudotrisaccharide consisting of two ''N''-acetylallosamine sugars linked to an allosamizoline moiety &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sakuda1987&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is a well known natural compound that is a high affinity inhibitor of family 18 chitinases (see Figure).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ligand_structures.PNG|thumb|right|super|300px|'''Trisaccharide oxazolinium ion intermediate (upper panel), allosamidin (middle panel), and trisaccharide thiazoline (lower panel).''']] Like in many other enzymes acting on polysaccharides the substrate-binding clefts of processive family 18 chitinases are lined with aromatic residues. Family 18 chitinases have proven very useful to gain insight into the structural basis of a processive mechanism and in the importance of such a mechanism for biomass-converting efficiency &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Eijsink2008,Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As previously suggested for cellulases in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Varrot2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, aromatic residues close to the catalytic center play a crucial role in processivity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006b&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytically-active GH18 enzymes use a double displacement reaction mechanism with [[neighboring group participation]](see Figure). In this mechanism the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate acts as a nucleophile, with assistance from a carboxylate (Asp) that acts to deprotonate the ''N''-acetamido nitrogen during [[oxazolinium ion]] formation/breakdown. A second catalytic acid residue (glutamate in family GH18, but often also Asp in other families using this mechanism, except for [[GH85]] where this residue is an amide) acts as a general acid/base to protonate the glycosidic oxygen to assist in the departure of the aglycon, and to deprotonate the nucleophilic water molecule during the hydrolysis of the [[oxazolinium ion]] [[intermediate]].  In family GH18 the two catalytic carboxylates are found in an D-X-E motif whereas in other families the carboxylates may be adjacent, such as the DD motif in family [[GH84]] (for example see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).  The physical separation of the two catalytic residues (with the second not in a position to act as a nucleophile itself) has led to confusion in some literature that GH18 and other enzymes (notably [[GH25]]) may be inverting enzymes; this is certainly not the case for GH18 and is unlikely to be the case for [[GH25]].[[Image:mechanism.jpg|thumb|right|600px|'''Catalytic mechanism of family 18 chitinases.''' The picture shows the mechanism proposed for ChiB from ''Serratia marcescens''. Panel c shows the oxazolium ion intermediate which is to be hydrolyzed by an incoming water molecule. The picture is taken from&amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D-X-E motif (Asp140-Glu144 in the Figure) is part of a diagnostic D-X-X-''D''-X-D-X-E motif that includes two more aspartates of which the one in italics (Asp140 in the Figure) is known to be essential for catalytic activity. There are several other conserved residues in the catalytic center that play important roles during catalysis, related to distortion of the -1 sugar, activation of the acetamido group and/or cycling of the p''K''a of the catalytic glutamate &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Synstad2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The O6 of the –1 sugar interacts with the side chain of yet another semi-conserved aspartate (Asp215 in the Figure). In enzymes with an acidic pH optimum this residue is an asparagine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Catalytically inactive members ===&lt;br /&gt;
One unusual of feature of plant members of the GH18 family is the large number of sequences that encode catalytically-inactive proteins that function as enzyme inhibitors or lectins. Phylogenetic analysis of the plant GH18 family reveals clear distinction between hevamine-type chitinases, putative chitinases and narbonins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Durand2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Out of the major subfamilies, only the one that contains hevamine contains enzymes of demonstrated activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The subfamily of GH18 that contains xylanase inhibitor proteins (XIP) emerged from the hevamine cluster along with concanavalin B. All have non-conservative substitutions of one of the acidic amino acid residues in the catalytic region. In the structure of concanavalin B the catalytic Glu residue is replaced by Gln &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Henniga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which mostly accounts for the lack of chitinase activity reported for this protein. The XIP-type inhibitors all have the third aspartic acid DxxDxDxE mutated into an aromatic residue whereas the catalytic glutamate residue is only conserved in the prototype of cereal xylanase inhibitors, XIP-I (isolated from ''Triticum aetivum'') &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In XIP-I and narbonin, the glutamic acid residues are present in an equivalent position to the catalytic residue in hevamine, but their side chain is fully engaged in salt bridges with neighbouring arginine residues &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, preventing chitinase activity despite the presence of the catalytic residue. Furthermore in both XIP-I and narbonin, the position equivalent to residue Asp in hevamine, which has been proposed to stabilize the positively charged [[oxazolinium ion]] reaction [[intermediate]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is occupied by a bulky residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The mutation of this Asp residue in alanine in hevamine led to a mutant with approx. 2% residual activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The most striking disruption of the cleft in XIP-I and narbonin is caused by the mutation of subsite -1 Gly which participates in the hydrogen-bonding network with the ligand &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;ATVA1 TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, resulting in complete obstruction of subsite -1 and preventing access to the catalytic residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Xylanase inhibitors appeared after the emergence of the various subfamilies of chitinases from their common ancestor. In this respect, the xylanase inhibitors are a relatively new acquisition, and so far no protein has been reported to display both xylanase inhibition and chitinase activities. GH18 XIP-type inhibitors can inhibit xylanases from [[GH10]] and [[GH11]] families &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The inhibition specificity of the GH18 xylanase inhibitors can be explained on the basis of the solved 3-D structure of XIP-I in complex with a [[GH10]] xylanase from ''A. nidulans'' and a [[GH11]] xylanase from ''P. funiculosum'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FIGURE ChiA_ChiB.jpg|thumb|right|500px|'''Structures of ChiA (left) and ChiB (right) from ''Serratia marcescens''.''' Panels A and B show C-alpha traces of the complete two-domain enzymes, with a substrate-binding non-catalytic domain pointing to the upper left (A) or lower right (B). The side chains of aromatic residues (possibly) involved in polysaccharide binding are shown in dark blue, whereas the side chain of the acid/base catalytic glutamate is shown in green. Panel C shows details of ChiA in complex with an chito-octamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1ehn 1ehn]) and panel D shows details of ChiB in complex with a chito-pentamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1e6n 1e6n]). Subsites are numbered. This picture was taken from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although these enzymes are frequently multi-modular, the catalytic domains are &amp;amp;alpha; / &amp;amp;beta; barrels &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. While several structures for complete bi-modular chitinases are available &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,Aalten2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (see Figure), available structural information for multi-modular enzymes is often limited to the isolated catalytic domain.&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the conformational itinerary of catalysis which is extremely similar to other [[retaining]] enzymes active on ''gluco''-configured substrates, was provided by the van Aalten group &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; in 2001 through the trapping of a distorted Michaelis complex in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1,4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''B'' conformation and thus extremely similar to the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''S''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; skew boats observed in [[GH5]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Davies1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for example or the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;E conformation originally seen for a &amp;quot;neighboring group&amp;quot; enzyme in [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. More recently, a similar conformation has been observed for the Michaelis complex of another neighboring group enzyme, the [[GH84]] O-GlcNAcase &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Fungal GH18 enzymes are considered as possible therapeutic targets and a number of programmes are probing this area (for example &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Housten2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First sterochemistry determination: Sometimes '''incorrectly''' reported as inverting, this family performs catalysis with '''retention''' of anomeric configuration as first shown on the ''Bacillus ciculans'' enzyme &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Armand1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[catalytic nucleophile]] identification: This family is one of many that uses neighbouring group participation for catalysis with the N-acetyl carbonyl group acting as the nucleophile; first proposed (we believe) for this family in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[general acid/base]] residue identification: On the basis of 3-D structure &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: The first two 3-D structures for catalytically active GH18 members were  the ''Serratia marcescens'' chitinase A and the plant defence protein hevamine published &amp;quot;back-to-back&amp;quot; in ''Structure'' in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  In retrospect, however, the non-catalytic &amp;quot;narbonin&amp;quot; structure was arguably the first GH18 3-D structure, although it is has no enzymatic activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennig1993&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Perrakis pmid=7704527&lt;br /&gt;
#ATVA1 pmid=7704528&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1994 pmid=8168626&lt;br /&gt;
#Koshland1953  Koshland, D. (1953) Biol. Rev. 28, 416.&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1997 pmid=9396742&lt;br /&gt;
#Housten2002 pmid=12093900&lt;br /&gt;
#Tews1996 pmid=8673609&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Macdonald pmid=20209544&lt;br /&gt;
#He2010 pmid=20067256&lt;br /&gt;
#Davies1998 pmid=9718293&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2003   pmid=12775711&lt;br /&gt;
#Henniga1995 pmid=7490746&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennig1993 pmid=1628747&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennigb1995 pmid=15299319&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1996 pmid=8831791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma2002 pmid=11846790&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2003 pmid=12617724&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2004 pmid=15181003&lt;br /&gt;
#Juge2004 pmid=14871661&lt;br /&gt;
#Durand2005 pmid=15794761&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1995 pmid=7495789&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006a pmid=16420473&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006b pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Sorbotten2005 pmid=15654891&lt;br /&gt;
#Varrot2003 pmid=12842048&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma1997 pmid=9271197&lt;br /&gt;
#Eijsink2008 pmid=18367275&lt;br /&gt;
#Hult2005 pmid=15717865&lt;br /&gt;
#Aalten2000 pmid=7675786&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Synstad2004 pmid=14717693&lt;br /&gt;
#Sakuda1987 pmid=3570982&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Glycoside Hydrolase Families|GH018]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6054</id>
		<title>Glycoside Hydrolase Family 18</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6054"/>
		<updated>2010-11-09T14:22:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{CuratorApproved}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]s: ^^^Gideon Davies^^^, ^^^Nathalie Juge^^^, ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Gideon Davies^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH18'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|GH-K&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|retaining&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|known (acid/neighbouring group)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH18.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Family GH18 is unusual in having [[glycoside hydrolases]] that are both catalytically active chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.96) and also sub-families of non-hydrolytic proteins that function as carbohydrate binding modules / &amp;quot;lectins&amp;quot; or as xylanase inhibitors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active chitinases comprise non-processive endo-acting enzymes as well as processive enzymes with exo- and endo-binding preferences &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a,Hult2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most enzymes primarily produce chitobiose, but some endo-acting family 18 chitinases are not capable to cleave trimers or tetramers and thus yield longer products. Note that in older literature the endo-/exo-character of these enzymes often is assessed by studying the degradation of oligomeric substrates, and that several recent studies have shown this method to be invalid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Family 18 chitinases break down all forms of chitin at varying rates depending on the enzyme and the substrate. They also act on chitosan with degrees of acetylation as low as 13 % &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sorbotten2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and some are known to degrade peptidoglycan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Studies on family 18 chitinases from ''Serratia marcescens'' have suggested that most subsites for sugar binding show some promiscuity with the notable exception of subsite -1 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
GH18 enzymes perform enzymic catalysis with [[retaining|retention]] of anomeric configuration. They belong to a growing group of enzymes (now including  GH families 18, [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 20|20]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 25|25]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 56|56]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 84|84]], and [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 85|85]]) that perform catalysis using a double-displacement reaction but instead of the more common enzyme-derived nucleophile they utilize the ''N''-acetamido carbonyl oxygen in what is termed [[neighboring group participation]] (or substrate participation or anchimeric assistance). Figures showing such a mechanism date back to Koshland's 1953 review &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Koshland1953&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;; indeed they frequent the chemical literature of participating groups long before that, but it is primarily through the work on GH18 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and soon after [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996,Armand1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; that such a mechanism became well established. In such a mechanism, which occurs with (net) retention of anomeric configuration, the enzyme provides a [[general acid]] function to protonate the leaving group to facilitate its departure with the substrate carbonyl oxygen playing the role of nucleophile to generate a bicyclic &amp;quot;[[oxazolinium ion]]&amp;quot; [[intermediate]], which subsequently breaks down following the microscopic reverse ''via'' hydrolysis or occasionally transglycosylation).  Such a mechanism has a number of facets, one of which is its potential inhibition using thiazolines &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Macdonald&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Allosamidin, a pseudotrisaccharide consisting of two ''N''-acetylallosamine sugars linked to an allosamizoline moiety &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sakuda1987&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is a well known natural compound that is a high affinity inhibitor of family 18 chitinases (see Figure).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ligand_structures.PNG|thumb|right|300px|'''Trisaccharide oxazolinium ion intermediate (upper panel), allosamidin (middle panel), and trisaccharide thiazoline (lower panel).''']] Like in many other enzymes acting on polysaccharides the substrate-binding clefts of processive family 18 chitinases are lined with aromatic residues. Family 18 chitinases have proven very useful to gain insight into the structural basis of a processive mechanism and in the importance of such a mechanism for biomass-converting efficiency &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Eijsink2008,Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As previously suggested for cellulases in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Varrot2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, aromatic residues close to the catalytic center play a crucial role in processivity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006b&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytically-active GH18 enzymes use a double displacement reaction mechanism with [[neighboring group participation]](see Figure). In this mechanism the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate acts as a nucleophile, with assistance from a carboxylate (Asp) that acts to deprotonate the ''N''-acetamido nitrogen during [[oxazolinium ion]] formation/breakdown. A second catalytic acid residue (glutamate in family GH18, but often also Asp in other families using this mechanism, except for [[GH85]] where this residue is an amide) acts as a general acid/base to protonate the glycosidic oxygen to assist in the departure of the aglycon, and to deprotonate the nucleophilic water molecule during the hydrolysis of the [[oxazolinium ion]] [[intermediate]].  In family GH18 the two catalytic carboxylates are found in an D-X-E motif whereas in other families the carboxylates may be adjacent, such as the DD motif in family [[GH84]] (for example see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).  The physical separation of the two catalytic residues (with the second not in a position to act as a nucleophile itself) has led to confusion in some literature that GH18 and other enzymes (notably [[GH25]]) may be inverting enzymes; this is certainly not the case for GH18 and is unlikely to be the case for [[GH25]].[[Image:mechanism.jpg|thumb|right|600px|'''Catalytic mechanism of family 18 chitinases.''' The picture shows the mechanism proposed for ChiB from ''Serratia marcescens''. Panel c shows the oxazolium ion intermediate which is to be hydrolyzed by an incoming water molecule. The picture is taken from&amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D-X-E motif (Asp140-Glu144 in the Figure) is part of a diagnostic D-X-X-''D''-X-D-X-E motif that includes two more aspartates of which the one in italics (Asp140 in the Figure) is known to be essential for catalytic activity. There are several other conserved residues in the catalytic center that play important roles during catalysis, related to distortion of the -1 sugar, activation of the acetamido group and/or cycling of the p''K''a of the catalytic glutamate &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Synstad2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The O6 of the –1 sugar interacts with the side chain of yet another semi-conserved aspartate (Asp215 in the Figure). In enzymes with an acidic pH optimum this residue is an asparagine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Catalytically inactive members ===&lt;br /&gt;
One unusual of feature of plant members of the GH18 family is the large number of sequences that encode catalytically-inactive proteins that function as enzyme inhibitors or lectins. Phylogenetic analysis of the plant GH18 family reveals clear distinction between hevamine-type chitinases, putative chitinases and narbonins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Durand2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Out of the major subfamilies, only the one that contains hevamine contains enzymes of demonstrated activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The subfamily of GH18 that contains xylanase inhibitor proteins (XIP) emerged from the hevamine cluster along with concanavalin B. All have non-conservative substitutions of one of the acidic amino acid residues in the catalytic region. In the structure of concanavalin B the catalytic Glu residue is replaced by Gln &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Henniga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which mostly accounts for the lack of chitinase activity reported for this protein. The XIP-type inhibitors all have the third aspartic acid DxxDxDxE mutated into an aromatic residue whereas the catalytic glutamate residue is only conserved in the prototype of cereal xylanase inhibitors, XIP-I (isolated from ''Triticum aetivum'') &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In XIP-I and narbonin, the glutamic acid residues are present in an equivalent position to the catalytic residue in hevamine, but their side chain is fully engaged in salt bridges with neighbouring arginine residues &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, preventing chitinase activity despite the presence of the catalytic residue. Furthermore in both XIP-I and narbonin, the position equivalent to residue Asp in hevamine, which has been proposed to stabilize the positively charged [[oxazolinium ion]] reaction [[intermediate]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is occupied by a bulky residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The mutation of this Asp residue in alanine in hevamine led to a mutant with approx. 2% residual activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The most striking disruption of the cleft in XIP-I and narbonin is caused by the mutation of subsite -1 Gly which participates in the hydrogen-bonding network with the ligand &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;ATVA1 TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, resulting in complete obstruction of subsite -1 and preventing access to the catalytic residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Xylanase inhibitors appeared after the emergence of the various subfamilies of chitinases from their common ancestor. In this respect, the xylanase inhibitors are a relatively new acquisition, and so far no protein has been reported to display both xylanase inhibition and chitinase activities. GH18 XIP-type inhibitors can inhibit xylanases from [[GH10]] and [[GH11]] families &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The inhibition specificity of the GH18 xylanase inhibitors can be explained on the basis of the solved 3-D structure of XIP-I in complex with a [[GH10]] xylanase from ''A. nidulans'' and a [[GH11]] xylanase from ''P. funiculosum'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FIGURE ChiA_ChiB.jpg|thumb|right|500px|'''Structures of ChiA (left) and ChiB (right) from ''Serratia marcescens''.''' Panels A and B show C-alpha traces of the complete two-domain enzymes, with a substrate-binding non-catalytic domain pointing to the upper left (A) or lower right (B). The side chains of aromatic residues (possibly) involved in polysaccharide binding are shown in dark blue, whereas the side chain of the acid/base catalytic glutamate is shown in green. Panel C shows details of ChiA in complex with an chito-octamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1ehn 1ehn]) and panel D shows details of ChiB in complex with a chito-pentamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1e6n 1e6n]). Subsites are numbered. This picture was taken from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although these enzymes are frequently multi-modular, the catalytic domains are &amp;amp;alpha; / &amp;amp;beta; barrels &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. While several structures for complete bi-modular chitinases are available &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,Aalten2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (see Figure), available structural information for multi-modular enzymes is often limited to the isolated catalytic domain.&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the conformational itinerary of catalysis which is extremely similar to other [[retaining]] enzymes active on ''gluco''-configured substrates, was provided by the van Aalten group &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; in 2001 through the trapping of a distorted Michaelis complex in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1,4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''B'' conformation and thus extremely similar to the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''S''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; skew boats observed in [[GH5]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Davies1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for example or the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;E conformation originally seen for a &amp;quot;neighboring group&amp;quot; enzyme in [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. More recently, a similar conformation has been observed for the Michaelis complex of another neighboring group enzyme, the [[GH84]] O-GlcNAcase &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Fungal GH18 enzymes are considered as possible therapeutic targets and a number of programmes are probing this area (for example &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Housten2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First sterochemistry determination: Sometimes '''incorrectly''' reported as inverting, this family performs catalysis with '''retention''' of anomeric configuration as first shown on the ''Bacillus ciculans'' enzyme &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Armand1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[catalytic nucleophile]] identification: This family is one of many that uses neighbouring group participation for catalysis with the N-acetyl carbonyl group acting as the nucleophile; first proposed (we believe) for this family in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[general acid/base]] residue identification: On the basis of 3-D structure &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: The first two 3-D structures for catalytically active GH18 members were  the ''Serratia marcescens'' chitinase A and the plant defence protein hevamine published &amp;quot;back-to-back&amp;quot; in ''Structure'' in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  In retrospect, however, the non-catalytic &amp;quot;narbonin&amp;quot; structure was arguably the first GH18 3-D structure, although it is has no enzymatic activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennig1993&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Perrakis pmid=7704527&lt;br /&gt;
#ATVA1 pmid=7704528&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1994 pmid=8168626&lt;br /&gt;
#Koshland1953  Koshland, D. (1953) Biol. Rev. 28, 416.&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1997 pmid=9396742&lt;br /&gt;
#Housten2002 pmid=12093900&lt;br /&gt;
#Tews1996 pmid=8673609&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Macdonald pmid=20209544&lt;br /&gt;
#He2010 pmid=20067256&lt;br /&gt;
#Davies1998 pmid=9718293&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2003   pmid=12775711&lt;br /&gt;
#Henniga1995 pmid=7490746&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennig1993 pmid=1628747&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennigb1995 pmid=15299319&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1996 pmid=8831791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma2002 pmid=11846790&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2003 pmid=12617724&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2004 pmid=15181003&lt;br /&gt;
#Juge2004 pmid=14871661&lt;br /&gt;
#Durand2005 pmid=15794761&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1995 pmid=7495789&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006a pmid=16420473&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006b pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Sorbotten2005 pmid=15654891&lt;br /&gt;
#Varrot2003 pmid=12842048&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma1997 pmid=9271197&lt;br /&gt;
#Eijsink2008 pmid=18367275&lt;br /&gt;
#Hult2005 pmid=15717865&lt;br /&gt;
#Aalten2000 pmid=7675786&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Synstad2004 pmid=14717693&lt;br /&gt;
#Sakuda1987 pmid=3570982&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Glycoside Hydrolase Families|GH018]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6053</id>
		<title>Glycoside Hydrolase Family 18</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6053"/>
		<updated>2010-11-09T14:21:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{CuratorApproved}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]s: ^^^Gideon Davies^^^, ^^^Nathalie Juge^^^, ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Gideon Davies^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH18'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|GH-K&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|retaining&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|known (acid/neighbouring group)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH18.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Family GH18 is unusual in having [[glycoside hydrolases]] that are both catalytically active chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.96) and also sub-families of non-hydrolytic proteins that function as carbohydrate binding modules / &amp;quot;lectins&amp;quot; or as xylanase inhibitors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active chitinases comprise non-processive endo-acting enzymes as well as processive enzymes with exo- and endo-binding preferences &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a,Hult2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most enzymes primarily produce chitobiose, but some endo-acting family 18 chitinases are not capable to cleave trimers or tetramers and thus yield longer products. Note that in older literature the endo-/exo-character of these enzymes often is assessed by studying the degradation of oligomeric substrates, and that several recent studies have shown this method to be invalid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Family 18 chitinases break down all forms of chitin at varying rates depending on the enzyme and the substrate. They also act on chitosan with degrees of acetylation as low as 13 % &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sorbotten2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and some are known to degrade peptidoglycan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Studies on family 18 chitinases from ''Serratia marcescens'' have suggested that most subsites for sugar binding show some promiscuity with the notable exception of subsite -1 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
GH18 enzymes perform enzymic catalysis with [[retaining|retention]] of anomeric configuration. They belong to a growing group of enzymes (now including  GH families 18, [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 20|20]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 25|25]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 56|56]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 84|84]], and [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 85|85]]) that perform catalysis using a double-displacement reaction but instead of the more common enzyme-derived nucleophile they utilize the ''N''-acetamido carbonyl oxygen in what is termed [[neighboring group participation]] (or substrate participation or anchimeric assistance). Figures showing such a mechanism date back to Koshland's 1953 review &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Koshland1953&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;; indeed they frequent the chemical literature of participating groups long before that, but it is primarily through the work on GH18 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and soon after [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996,Armand1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; that such a mechanism became well established. In such a mechanism, which occurs with (net) retention of anomeric configuration, the enzyme provides a [[general acid]] function to protonate the leaving group to facilitate its departure with the substrate carbonyl oxygen playing the role of nucleophile to generate a bicyclic &amp;quot;[[oxazolinium ion]]&amp;quot; [[intermediate]], which subsequently breaks down following the microscopic reverse ''via'' hydrolysis or occasionally transglycosylation).  Such a mechanism has a number of facets, one of which is its potential inhibition using thiazolines &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Macdonald&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Allosamidin, a pseudotrisaccharide consisting of two ''N''-acetylallosamine sugars linked to an allosamizoline moiety &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sakuda1987&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is a well known natural compound that is a high affinity inhibitor of family 18 chitinases (see Figure).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ligand_structures.PNG|thumb|right|250px|'''Trisaccharide oxazolinium ion intermediate (upper panel), allosamidin (middle panel), and trisaccharide thiazoline (lower panel).''']] Like in many other enzymes acting on polysaccharides the substrate-binding clefts of processive family 18 chitinases are lined with aromatic residues. Family 18 chitinases have proven very useful to gain insight into the structural basis of a processive mechanism and in the importance of such a mechanism for biomass-converting efficiency &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Eijsink2008,Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As previously suggested for cellulases in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Varrot2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, aromatic residues close to the catalytic center play a crucial role in processivity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006b&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytically-active GH18 enzymes use a double displacement reaction mechanism with [[neighboring group participation]](see Figure). In this mechanism the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate acts as a nucleophile, with assistance from a carboxylate (Asp) that acts to deprotonate the ''N''-acetamido nitrogen during [[oxazolinium ion]] formation/breakdown. A second catalytic acid residue (glutamate in family GH18, but often also Asp in other families using this mechanism, except for [[GH85]] where this residue is an amide) acts as a general acid/base to protonate the glycosidic oxygen to assist in the departure of the aglycon, and to deprotonate the nucleophilic water molecule during the hydrolysis of the [[oxazolinium ion]] [[intermediate]].  In family GH18 the two catalytic carboxylates are found in an D-X-E motif whereas in other families the carboxylates may be adjacent, such as the DD motif in family [[GH84]] (for example see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).  The physical separation of the two catalytic residues (with the second not in a position to act as a nucleophile itself) has led to confusion in some literature that GH18 and other enzymes (notably [[GH25]]) may be inverting enzymes; this is certainly not the case for GH18 and is unlikely to be the case for [[GH25]].[[Image:mechanism.jpg|thumb|right|600px|'''Catalytic mechanism of family 18 chitinases.''' The picture shows the mechanism proposed for ChiB from ''Serratia marcescens''. Panel c shows the oxazolium ion intermediate which is to be hydrolyzed by an incoming water molecule. The picture is taken from&amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D-X-E motif (Asp140-Glu144 in the Figure) is part of a diagnostic D-X-X-''D''-X-D-X-E motif that includes two more aspartates of which the one in italics (Asp140 in the Figure) is known to be essential for catalytic activity. There are several other conserved residues in the catalytic center that play important roles during catalysis, related to distortion of the -1 sugar, activation of the acetamido group and/or cycling of the p''K''a of the catalytic glutamate &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Synstad2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The O6 of the –1 sugar interacts with the side chain of yet another semi-conserved aspartate (Asp215 in the Figure). In enzymes with an acidic pH optimum this residue is an asparagine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Catalytically inactive members ===&lt;br /&gt;
One unusual of feature of plant members of the GH18 family is the large number of sequences that encode catalytically-inactive proteins that function as enzyme inhibitors or lectins. Phylogenetic analysis of the plant GH18 family reveals clear distinction between hevamine-type chitinases, putative chitinases and narbonins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Durand2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Out of the major subfamilies, only the one that contains hevamine contains enzymes of demonstrated activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The subfamily of GH18 that contains xylanase inhibitor proteins (XIP) emerged from the hevamine cluster along with concanavalin B. All have non-conservative substitutions of one of the acidic amino acid residues in the catalytic region. In the structure of concanavalin B the catalytic Glu residue is replaced by Gln &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Henniga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which mostly accounts for the lack of chitinase activity reported for this protein. The XIP-type inhibitors all have the third aspartic acid DxxDxDxE mutated into an aromatic residue whereas the catalytic glutamate residue is only conserved in the prototype of cereal xylanase inhibitors, XIP-I (isolated from ''Triticum aetivum'') &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In XIP-I and narbonin, the glutamic acid residues are present in an equivalent position to the catalytic residue in hevamine, but their side chain is fully engaged in salt bridges with neighbouring arginine residues &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, preventing chitinase activity despite the presence of the catalytic residue. Furthermore in both XIP-I and narbonin, the position equivalent to residue Asp in hevamine, which has been proposed to stabilize the positively charged [[oxazolinium ion]] reaction [[intermediate]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is occupied by a bulky residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The mutation of this Asp residue in alanine in hevamine led to a mutant with approx. 2% residual activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The most striking disruption of the cleft in XIP-I and narbonin is caused by the mutation of subsite -1 Gly which participates in the hydrogen-bonding network with the ligand &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;ATVA1 TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, resulting in complete obstruction of subsite -1 and preventing access to the catalytic residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Xylanase inhibitors appeared after the emergence of the various subfamilies of chitinases from their common ancestor. In this respect, the xylanase inhibitors are a relatively new acquisition, and so far no protein has been reported to display both xylanase inhibition and chitinase activities. GH18 XIP-type inhibitors can inhibit xylanases from [[GH10]] and [[GH11]] families &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The inhibition specificity of the GH18 xylanase inhibitors can be explained on the basis of the solved 3-D structure of XIP-I in complex with a [[GH10]] xylanase from ''A. nidulans'' and a [[GH11]] xylanase from ''P. funiculosum'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FIGURE ChiA_ChiB.jpg|thumb|right|500px|'''Structures of ChiA (left) and ChiB (right) from ''Serratia marcescens''.''' Panels A and B show C-alpha traces of the complete two-domain enzymes, with a substrate-binding non-catalytic domain pointing to the upper left (A) or lower right (B). The side chains of aromatic residues (possibly) involved in polysaccharide binding are shown in dark blue, whereas the side chain of the acid/base catalytic glutamate is shown in green. Panel C shows details of ChiA in complex with an chito-octamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1ehn 1ehn]) and panel D shows details of ChiB in complex with a chito-pentamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1e6n 1e6n]). Subsites are numbered. This picture was taken from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although these enzymes are frequently multi-modular, the catalytic domains are &amp;amp;alpha; / &amp;amp;beta; barrels &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. While several structures for complete bi-modular chitinases are available &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,Aalten2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (see Figure), available structural information for multi-modular enzymes is often limited to the isolated catalytic domain.&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the conformational itinerary of catalysis which is extremely similar to other [[retaining]] enzymes active on ''gluco''-configured substrates, was provided by the van Aalten group &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; in 2001 through the trapping of a distorted Michaelis complex in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1,4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''B'' conformation and thus extremely similar to the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''S''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; skew boats observed in [[GH5]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Davies1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for example or the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;E conformation originally seen for a &amp;quot;neighboring group&amp;quot; enzyme in [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. More recently, a similar conformation has been observed for the Michaelis complex of another neighboring group enzyme, the [[GH84]] O-GlcNAcase &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Fungal GH18 enzymes are considered as possible therapeutic targets and a number of programmes are probing this area (for example &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Housten2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First sterochemistry determination: Sometimes '''incorrectly''' reported as inverting, this family performs catalysis with '''retention''' of anomeric configuration as first shown on the ''Bacillus ciculans'' enzyme &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Armand1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[catalytic nucleophile]] identification: This family is one of many that uses neighbouring group participation for catalysis with the N-acetyl carbonyl group acting as the nucleophile; first proposed (we believe) for this family in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[general acid/base]] residue identification: On the basis of 3-D structure &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: The first two 3-D structures for catalytically active GH18 members were  the ''Serratia marcescens'' chitinase A and the plant defence protein hevamine published &amp;quot;back-to-back&amp;quot; in ''Structure'' in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  In retrospect, however, the non-catalytic &amp;quot;narbonin&amp;quot; structure was arguably the first GH18 3-D structure, although it is has no enzymatic activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennig1993&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Perrakis pmid=7704527&lt;br /&gt;
#ATVA1 pmid=7704528&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1994 pmid=8168626&lt;br /&gt;
#Koshland1953  Koshland, D. (1953) Biol. Rev. 28, 416.&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1997 pmid=9396742&lt;br /&gt;
#Housten2002 pmid=12093900&lt;br /&gt;
#Tews1996 pmid=8673609&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Macdonald pmid=20209544&lt;br /&gt;
#He2010 pmid=20067256&lt;br /&gt;
#Davies1998 pmid=9718293&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2003   pmid=12775711&lt;br /&gt;
#Henniga1995 pmid=7490746&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennig1993 pmid=1628747&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennigb1995 pmid=15299319&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1996 pmid=8831791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma2002 pmid=11846790&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2003 pmid=12617724&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2004 pmid=15181003&lt;br /&gt;
#Juge2004 pmid=14871661&lt;br /&gt;
#Durand2005 pmid=15794761&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1995 pmid=7495789&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006a pmid=16420473&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006b pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Sorbotten2005 pmid=15654891&lt;br /&gt;
#Varrot2003 pmid=12842048&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma1997 pmid=9271197&lt;br /&gt;
#Eijsink2008 pmid=18367275&lt;br /&gt;
#Hult2005 pmid=15717865&lt;br /&gt;
#Aalten2000 pmid=7675786&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Synstad2004 pmid=14717693&lt;br /&gt;
#Sakuda1987 pmid=3570982&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Glycoside Hydrolase Families|GH018]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=File:Ligand_structures.PNG&amp;diff=6052</id>
		<title>File:Ligand structures.PNG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=File:Ligand_structures.PNG&amp;diff=6052"/>
		<updated>2010-11-09T14:18:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6051</id>
		<title>Glycoside Hydrolase Family 18</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6051"/>
		<updated>2010-11-09T07:41:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{CuratorApproved}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]s: ^^^Gideon Davies^^^, ^^^Nathalie Juge^^^, ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Gideon Davies^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH18'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|GH-K&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|retaining&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|known (acid/neighbouring group)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH18.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Family GH18 is unusual in having [[glycoside hydrolases]] that are both catalytically active chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.96) and also sub-families of non-hydrolytic proteins that function as carbohydrate binding modules / &amp;quot;lectins&amp;quot; or as xylanase inhibitors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active chitinases comprise non-processive endo-acting enzymes as well as processive enzymes with exo- and endo-binding preferences &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a,Hult2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most enzymes primarily produce chitobiose, but some endo-acting family 18 chitinases are not capable to cleave trimers or tetramers and thus yield longer products. Note that in older literature the endo-/exo-character of these enzymes often is assessed by studying the degradation of oligomeric substrates, and that several recent studies have shown this method to be invalid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Family 18 chitinases break down all forms of chitin at varying rates depending on the enzyme and the substrate. They also act on chitosan with degrees of acetylation as low as 13 % &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sorbotten2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and some are known to degrade peptidoglycan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Studies on family 18 chitinases from ''Serratia marcescens'' have suggested that most subsites for sugar binding show some promiscuity with the notable exception of subsite -1 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
GH18 enzymes perform enzymic catalysis with [[retaining|retention]] of anomeric configuration. They belong to a growing group of enzymes (now including  GH families 18, [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 20|20]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 25|25]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 56|56]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 84|84]], and [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 85|85]]) that perform catalysis using a double-displacement reaction but instead of the more common enzyme-derived nucleophile they utilize the ''N''-acetamido carbonyl oxygen in what is termed [[neighboring group participation]] (or substrate participation or anchimeric assistance). Figures showing such a mechanism date back to Koshland's 1953 review &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Koshland1953&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;; indeed they frequent the chemical literature of participating groups long before that, but it is primarily through the work on GH18 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and soon after [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996,Armand1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; that such a mechanism became well established. In such a mechanism, which occurs with (net) retention of anomeric configuration, the enzyme provides a [[general acid]] function to protonate the leaving group to facilitate its departure with the substrate carbonyl oxygen playing the role of nucleophile to generate a bicyclic &amp;quot;[[oxazolinium ion]]&amp;quot; [[intermediate]], which subsequently breaks down following the microscopic reverse ''via'' hydrolysis or occasionally transglycosylation).  Such a mechanism has a number of facets, one of which is its potential inhibition using thiazolines &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Macdonald&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Allosamidin, a pseudotrisaccharide consisting of two ''N''-acetylallosamine sugars linked to an allosamizoline moiety &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sakuda1987&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is a well known natural compound that is a high affinity inhibitor of family 18 chitinases (see Figure).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:allosamidin.png|thumb|right|250px|'''Oxazolinium ion intermediate (A) and allosamidin (B).''']] Like in many other enzymes acting on polysaccharides the substrate-binding clefts of processive family 18 chitinases are lined with aromatic residues. Family 18 chitinases have proven very useful to gain insight into the structural basis of a processive mechanism and in the importance of such a mechanism for biomass-converting efficiency &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Eijsink2008,Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As previously suggested for cellulases in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Varrot2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, aromatic residues close to the catalytic center play a crucial role in processivity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006b&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytically-active GH18 enzymes use a double displacement reaction mechanism with [[neighboring group participation]](see Figure). In this mechanism the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate acts as a nucleophile, with assistance from a carboxylate (Asp) that acts to deprotonate the ''N''-acetamido nitrogen during [[oxazolinium ion]] formation/breakdown. A second catalytic acid residue (glutamate in family GH18, but often also Asp in other families using this mechanism, except for [[GH85]] where this residue is an amide) acts as a general acid/base to protonate the glycosidic oxygen to assist in the departure of the aglycon, and to deprotonate the nucleophilic water molecule during the hydrolysis of the [[oxazolinium ion]] [[intermediate]].  In family GH18 the two catalytic carboxylates are found in an D-X-E motif whereas in other families the carboxylates may be adjacent, such as the DD motif in family [[GH84]] (for example see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).  The physical separation of the two catalytic residues (with the second not in a position to act as a nucleophile itself) has led to confusion in some literature that GH18 and other enzymes (notably [[GH25]]) may be inverting enzymes; this is certainly not the case for GH18 and is unlikely to be the case for [[GH25]].[[Image:mechanism.jpg|thumb|right|600px|'''Catalytic mechanism of family 18 chitinases.''' The picture shows the mechanism proposed for ChiB from ''Serratia marcescens''. Panel c shows the oxazolium ion intermediate which is to be hydrolyzed by an incoming water molecule. The picture is taken from&amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D-X-E motif (Asp140-Glu144 in the Figure) is part of a diagnostic D-X-X-''D''-X-D-X-E motif that includes two more aspartates of which the one in italics (Asp140 in the Figure) is known to be essential for catalytic activity. There are several other conserved residues in the catalytic center that play important roles during catalysis, related to distortion of the -1 sugar, activation of the acetamido group and/or cycling of the p''K''a of the catalytic glutamate &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Synstad2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The O6 of the –1 sugar interacts with the side chain of yet another semi-conserved aspartate (Asp215 in the Figure). In enzymes with an acidic pH optimum this residue is an asparagine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Catalytically inactive members ===&lt;br /&gt;
One unusual of feature of plant members of the GH18 family is the large number of sequences that encode catalytically-inactive proteins that function as enzyme inhibitors or lectins. Phylogenetic analysis of the plant GH18 family reveals clear distinction between hevamine-type chitinases, putative chitinases and narbonins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Durand2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Out of the major subfamilies, only the one that contains hevamine contains enzymes of demonstrated activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The subfamily of GH18 that contains xylanase inhibitor proteins (XIP) emerged from the hevamine cluster along with concanavalin B. All have non-conservative substitutions of one of the acidic amino acid residues in the catalytic region. In the structure of concanavalin B the catalytic Glu residue is replaced by Gln &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Henniga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which mostly accounts for the lack of chitinase activity reported for this protein. The XIP-type inhibitors all have the third aspartic acid DxxDxDxE mutated into an aromatic residue whereas the catalytic glutamate residue is only conserved in the prototype of cereal xylanase inhibitors, XIP-I (isolated from ''Triticum aetivum'') &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In XIP-I and narbonin, the glutamic acid residues are present in an equivalent position to the catalytic residue in hevamine, but their side chain is fully engaged in salt bridges with neighbouring arginine residues &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, preventing chitinase activity despite the presence of the catalytic residue. Furthermore in both XIP-I and narbonin, the position equivalent to residue Asp in hevamine, which has been proposed to stabilize the positively charged [[oxazolinium ion]] reaction [[intermediate]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is occupied by a bulky residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The mutation of this Asp residue in alanine in hevamine led to a mutant with approx. 2% residual activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The most striking disruption of the cleft in XIP-I and narbonin is caused by the mutation of subsite -1 Gly which participates in the hydrogen-bonding network with the ligand &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;ATVA1 TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, resulting in complete obstruction of subsite -1 and preventing access to the catalytic residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Xylanase inhibitors appeared after the emergence of the various subfamilies of chitinases from their common ancestor. In this respect, the xylanase inhibitors are a relatively new acquisition, and so far no protein has been reported to display both xylanase inhibition and chitinase activities. GH18 XIP-type inhibitors can inhibit xylanases from [[GH10]] and [[GH11]] families &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The inhibition specificity of the GH18 xylanase inhibitors can be explained on the basis of the solved 3-D structure of XIP-I in complex with a [[GH10]] xylanase from ''A. nidulans'' and a [[GH11]] xylanase from ''P. funiculosum'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FIGURE ChiA_ChiB.jpg|thumb|right|500px|'''Structures of ChiA (left) and ChiB (right) from ''Serratia marcescens''.''' Panels A and B show C-alpha traces of the complete two-domain enzymes, with a substrate-binding non-catalytic domain pointing to the upper left (A) or lower right (B). The side chains of aromatic residues (possibly) involved in polysaccharide binding are shown in dark blue, whereas the side chain of the acid/base catalytic glutamate is shown in green. Panel C shows details of ChiA in complex with an chito-octamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1ehn 1ehn]) and panel D shows details of ChiB in complex with a chito-pentamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1e6n 1e6n]). Subsites are numbered. This picture was taken from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although these enzymes are frequently multi-modular, the catalytic domains are &amp;amp;alpha; / &amp;amp;beta; barrels &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. While several structures for complete bi-modular chitinases are available &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,Aalten2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (see Figure), available structural information for multi-modular enzymes is often limited to the isolated catalytic domain.&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the conformational itinerary of catalysis which is extremely similar to other [[retaining]] enzymes active on ''gluco''-configured substrates, was provided by the van Aalten group &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; in 2001 through the trapping of a distorted Michaelis complex in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1,4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''B'' conformation and thus extremely similar to the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''S''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; skew boats observed in [[GH5]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Davies1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for example or the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;E conformation originally seen for a &amp;quot;neighboring group&amp;quot; enzyme in [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. More recently, a similar conformation has been observed for the Michaelis complex of another neighboring group enzyme, the [[GH84]] O-GlcNAcase &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Fungal GH18 enzymes are considered as possible therapeutic targets and a number of programmes are probing this area (for example &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Housten2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First sterochemistry determination: Sometimes '''incorrectly''' reported as inverting, this family performs catalysis with '''retention''' of anomeric configuration as first shown on the ''Bacillus ciculans'' enzyme &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Armand1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[catalytic nucleophile]] identification: This family is one of many that uses neighbouring group participation for catalysis with the N-acetyl carbonyl group acting as the nucleophile; first proposed (we believe) for this family in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[general acid/base]] residue identification: On the basis of 3-D structure &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: The first two 3-D structures for catalytically active GH18 members were  the ''Serratia marcescens'' chitinase A and the plant defence protein hevamine published &amp;quot;back-to-back&amp;quot; in ''Structure'' in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  In retrospect, however, the non-catalytic &amp;quot;narbonin&amp;quot; structure was arguably the first GH18 3-D structure, although it is has no enzymatic activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennig1993&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Perrakis pmid=7704527&lt;br /&gt;
#ATVA1 pmid=7704528&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1994 pmid=8168626&lt;br /&gt;
#Koshland1953  Koshland, D. (1953) Biol. Rev. 28, 416.&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1997 pmid=9396742&lt;br /&gt;
#Housten2002 pmid=12093900&lt;br /&gt;
#Tews1996 pmid=8673609&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Macdonald pmid=20209544&lt;br /&gt;
#He2010 pmid=20067256&lt;br /&gt;
#Davies1998 pmid=9718293&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2003   pmid=12775711&lt;br /&gt;
#Henniga1995 pmid=7490746&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennig1993 pmid=1628747&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennigb1995 pmid=15299319&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1996 pmid=8831791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma2002 pmid=11846790&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2003 pmid=12617724&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2004 pmid=15181003&lt;br /&gt;
#Juge2004 pmid=14871661&lt;br /&gt;
#Durand2005 pmid=15794761&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1995 pmid=7495789&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006a pmid=16420473&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006b pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Sorbotten2005 pmid=15654891&lt;br /&gt;
#Varrot2003 pmid=12842048&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma1997 pmid=9271197&lt;br /&gt;
#Eijsink2008 pmid=18367275&lt;br /&gt;
#Hult2005 pmid=15717865&lt;br /&gt;
#Aalten2000 pmid=7675786&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Synstad2004 pmid=14717693&lt;br /&gt;
#Sakuda1987 pmid=3570982&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Glycoside Hydrolase Families|GH018]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=File:FIGURE_ChiA_ChiB.jpg&amp;diff=6050</id>
		<title>File:FIGURE ChiA ChiB.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=File:FIGURE_ChiA_ChiB.jpg&amp;diff=6050"/>
		<updated>2010-11-09T07:37:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6042</id>
		<title>Glycoside Hydrolase Family 18</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6042"/>
		<updated>2010-11-05T16:59:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{CuratorApproved}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]s: ^^^Gideon Davies^^^, ^^^Nathalie Juge^^^, ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Gideon Davies^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH18'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|GH-K&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|retaining&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|known (acid/neighbouring group)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH18.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Family GH18 is unusual in having [[glycoside hydrolases]] that are both catalytically active chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.96) and also sub-families of non-hydrolytic proteins that function as carbohydrate binding modules / &amp;quot;lectins&amp;quot; or as xylanase inhibitors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active chitinases comprise non-processive endo-acting enzymes as well as processive enzymes with exo- and endo-binding preferences &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a,Hult2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most enzymes primarily produce chitobiose, but some endo-acting family 18 chitinases are not capable to cleave trimers or tetramers and thus yield longer products. Note that in older literature the endo-/exo-character of these enzymes often is assessed by studying the degradation of oligomeric substrates, and that several recent studies have shown this method to be invalid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Family 18 chitinases break down all forms of chitin at varying rates depending on the enzyme and the substrate. They also act on chitosan with degrees of acetylation as low as 13 % &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sorbotten2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and some are known to degrade peptidoglycan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Studies on family 18 chitinases from ''Serratia marcescens'' have suggested that most subsites for sugar binding show some promiscuity with the notable exception of subsite -1 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
GH18 enzymes perform enzymic catalysis with [[retaining|retention]] of anomeric configuration. They belong to a growing group of enzymes (now including  GH families 18, [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 20|20]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 25|25]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 56|56]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 84|84]], and [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 85|85]]) that perform catalysis using a double-displacement reaction but instead of the more common enzyme-derived nucleophile they utilize the ''N''-acetamido carbonyl oxygen in what is termed [[neighboring group participation]] (or substrate participation or anchimeric assistance). Figures showing such a mechanism date back to Koshland's 1953 review &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Koshland1953&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;; indeed they frequent the chemical literature of participating groups long before that, but it is primarily through the work on GH18 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and soon after [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996,Armand1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; that such a mechanism became well established. In such a mechanism, which occurs with (net) retention of anomeric configuration, the enzyme provides a [[general acid]] function to protonate the leaving group to facilitate its departure with the substrate carbonyl oxygen playing the role of nucleophile to generate a bicyclic &amp;quot;[[oxazolinium ion]]&amp;quot; [[intermediate]], which subsequently breaks down following the microscopic reverse ''via'' hydrolysis or occasionally transglycosylation).  Such a mechanism has a number of facets, one of which is its potential inhibition using thiazolines &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Macdonald&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Allosamidin, a pseudotrisaccharide consisting of two ''N''-acetylallosamine sugars linked to an allosamizoline moiety &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sakuda1987&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is a well known natural compound that is a high affinity inhibitor of family 18 chitinases (see Figure).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:allosamidin.png|thumb|right|400px|'''Oxazolinium ion intermediate (A) and allosamidin (B).''']] Like in many other enzymes acting on polysaccharides the substrate-binding clefts of processive family 18 chitinases are lined with aromatic residues. Family 18 chitinases have proven very useful to gain insight into the structural basis of a processive mechanism an in the importance of such a mechanism for biomass-converting efficiency &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Eijsink2008,Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As previously suggested for cellulases in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Varrot2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, aromatic residues close to the catalytic center play a crucial role in processivity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006b&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytically-active GH18 enzymes use a double displacement reaction mechanism with [[neighboring group participation]](see Figure). In this mechanism the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate acts as a nucleophile, with assistance from a carboxylate (Asp) that acts to deprotonate the ''N''-acetamido nitrogen during [[oxazolinium ion]] formation/breakdown. A second catalytic acid residue (glutamate in family GH18, but often also Asp in other families using this mechanism, except for [[GH85]] where this residue is an amide) acts as a general acid/base to protonate the glycosidic oxygen to assist in the departure of the aglycon, and to deprotonate the nucleophilic water molecule during the hydrolysis of the [[oxazolinium ion]] [[intermediate]].  In family GH18 the two catalytic carboxylates are found in an D-X-E motif whereas in other families the carboxylates may be adjacent, such as the DD motif in family [[GH84]] (for example see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).  The physical separation of the two catalytic residues (with the second not in a position to act as a nucleophile itself) has led to confusion in some literature that GH18 and other enzymes (notably [[GH25]]) may be inverting enzymes; this is certainly not the case for GH18 and is unlikely to be the case for [[GH25]].[[Image:mechanism.jpg|thumb|right|1000px|'''Catalytic mechanism of family 18 chitinases.''' The picture shows the mechanism proposed for ChiB from ''Serratia marcescens''. Panel c shows the oxazolium ion intermediate which is to be hydrolyzed by an incoming water molecule. The picture is taken from&amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D-X-E motif (Asp140-Glu144 in the Figure) is part of a diagnostic D-X-X-''D''-X-D-X-E motif that includes two more aspartates of which the one in italics (Asp140 in the Figure) is known to be essential for catalytic activity. There are several other conserved residues in the catalytic center that play important roles during catalysis, related to distortion of the -1 sugar, activation of the acetamido group and/or cycling of the p''K''a of the catalytic glutamate &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Synstad2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The O6 of the –1 sugar interacts with the side chain of yet another semi-conserved aspartate (Asp215 in the Figure). In enzymes with an acidic pH optimum this residue is an asparagine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Catalytically inactive members ===&lt;br /&gt;
One unusual of feature of plant members of the GH18 family is the large number of sequences that encode catalytically-inactive proteins that function as enzyme inhibitors or lectins. Phylogenetic analysis of the plant GH18 family reveals clear distinction between hevamine-type chitinases, putative chitinases and narbonins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Durand2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Out of the major subfamilies, only the one that contains hevamine contains enzymes of demonstrated activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The subfamily of GH18 that contains xylanase inhibitor proteins (XIP) emerged from the hevamine cluster along with concanavalin B. All have non-conservative substitutions of one of the acidic amino acid residues in the catalytic region. In the structure of concanavalin B the catalytic Glu residue is replaced by Gln &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Henniga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which mostly accounts for the lack of chitinase activity reported for this protein. The XIP-type inhibitors all have the third aspartic acid DxxDxDxE mutated into an aromatic residue whereas the catalytic glutamate residue is only conserved in the prototype of cereal xylanase inhibitors, XIP-I (isolated from ''Triticum aetivum'') &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In XIP-I and narbonin, the glutamic acid residues are present in an equivalent position to the catalytic residue in hevamine, but their side chain is fully engaged in salt bridges with neighbouring arginine residues &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, preventing chitinase activity despite the presence of the catalytic residue. Furthermore in both XIP-I and narbonin, the position equivalent to residue Asp in hevamine, which has been proposed to stabilize the positively charged [[oxazolinium ion]] reaction [[intermediate]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is occupied by a bulky residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The mutation of this Asp residue in alanine in hevamine led to a mutant with approx. 2% residual activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The most striking disruption of the cleft in XIP-I and narbonin is caused by the mutation of subsite -1 Gly which participates in the hydrogen-bonding network with the ligand &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;ATVA1 TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, resulting in complete obstruction of subsite -1 and preventing access to the catalytic residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Xylanase inhibitors appeared after the emergence of the various subfamilies of chitinases from their common ancestor. In this respect, the xylanase inhibitors are a relatively new acquisition, and so far no protein has been reported to display both xylanase inhibition and chitinase activities. GH18 XIP-type inhibitors can inhibit xylanases from [[GH10]] and [[GH11]] families &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The inhibition specificity of the GH18 xylanase inhibitors can be explained on the basis of the solved 3-D structure of XIP-I in complex with a [[GH10]] xylanase from ''A. nidulans'' and a [[GH11]] xylanase from ''P. funiculosum'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ChiAB.jpg|thumb|right|500px|'''Structures of ChiA (left) and ChiB (right) from ''Serratia marcescens''.''' Panels A and B show C-alpha traces of the complete two-domain enzymes, with a substrate-binding non-catalytic domain pointing to the upper left (A) or lower right (B). The side chains of aromatic residues (possibly) involved in polysaccharide binding are shown in dark blue, whereas the side chain of the acid/base catalytic glutamate is shown in green. Panel C shows details of ChiA in complex with an chito-octamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1ehn 1ehn]) and panel D shows details of ChiB in complex with a chito-pentamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1e6n 1e6n]). Subsites are numbered. This picture was taken from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although these enzymes are frequently multi-modular, the catalytic domains are &amp;amp;alpha; / &amp;amp;beta; barrels &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. While several structures for complete bi-modular chitinases are available &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,Aalten2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (see Figure), available structural information for multi-modular enzymes is often limited to the isolated catalytic domain.&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the conformational itinerary of catalysis which is extremely similar to other [[retaining]] enzymes active on ''gluco''-configured substrates, was provided by the van Aalten group &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; in 2001 through the trapping of a distorted Michaelis complex in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1,4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''B'' conformation and thus extremely similar to the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''S''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; skew boats observed in [[GH5]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Davies1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for example or the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;E conformation originally seen for a &amp;quot;neighboring group&amp;quot; enzyme in [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. More recently, a similar conformation has been observed for the Michaelis complex of another neighboring group enzyme, the [[GH84]] O-GlcNAcase &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Fungal GH18 enzymes are considered as possible therapeutic targets and a number of programmes are probing this area (for example &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Housten2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First sterochemistry determination: Sometimes '''incorrectly''' reported as inverting, this family performs catalysis with '''retention''' of anomeric configuration as first shown on the ''Bacillus ciculans'' enzyme &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Armand1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[catalytic nucleophile]] identification: This family is one of many that uses neighbouring group participation for catalysis with the N-acetyl carbonyl group acting as the nucleophile; first proposed (we believe) for this family in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[general acid/base]] residue identification: On the basis of 3-D structure &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: The first two 3-D structures for catalytically active GH18 members were  the ''Serratia marcescens'' chitinase A and the plant defence protein hevamine published &amp;quot;back-to-back&amp;quot; in ''Structure'' in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  In retrospect, however, the non-catalytic &amp;quot;narbonin&amp;quot; structure was arguably the first GH18 3-D structure, although it is has no enzymatic activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennig1993&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Perrakis pmid=7704527&lt;br /&gt;
#ATVA1 pmid=7704528&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1994 pmid=8168626&lt;br /&gt;
#Koshland1953  Koshland, D. (1953) Biol. Rev. 28, 416.&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1997 pmid=9396742&lt;br /&gt;
#Housten2002 pmid=12093900&lt;br /&gt;
#Tews1996 pmid=8673609&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Macdonald pmid=20209544&lt;br /&gt;
#He2010 pmid=20067256&lt;br /&gt;
#Davies1998 pmid=9718293&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2003   pmid=12775711&lt;br /&gt;
#Henniga1995 pmid=7490746&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennig1993 pmid=1628747&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennigb1995 pmid=15299319&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1996 pmid=8831791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma2002 pmid=11846790&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2003 pmid=12617724&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2004 pmid=15181003&lt;br /&gt;
#Juge2004 pmid=14871661&lt;br /&gt;
#Durand2005 pmid=15794761&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1995 pmid=7495789&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006a pmid=16420473&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006b pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Sorbotten2005 pmid=15654891&lt;br /&gt;
#Varrot2003 pmid=12842048&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma1997 pmid=9271197&lt;br /&gt;
#Eijsink2008 pmid=18367275&lt;br /&gt;
#Hult2005 pmid=15717865&lt;br /&gt;
#Aalten2000 pmid=7675786&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Synstad2004 pmid=14717693&lt;br /&gt;
#Sakuda1987 pmid=3570982&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Glycoside Hydrolase Families|GH018]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6041</id>
		<title>Glycoside Hydrolase Family 18</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6041"/>
		<updated>2010-11-05T16:57:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{CuratorApproved}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]s: ^^^Gideon Davies^^^, ^^^Nathalie Juge^^^, ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Gideon Davies^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH18'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|GH-K&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|retaining&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|known (acid/neighbouring group)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH18.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Family GH18 is unusual in having [[glycoside hydrolases]] that are both catalytically active chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.96) and also sub-families of non-hydrolytic proteins that function as carbohydrate binding modules / &amp;quot;lectins&amp;quot; or as xylanase inhibitors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active chitinases comprise non-processive endo-acting enzymes as well as processive enzymes with exo- and endo-binding preferences &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a,Hult2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most enzymes primarily produce chitobiose, but some endo-acting family 18 chitinases are not capable to cleave trimers or tetramers and thus yield longer products. Note that in older literature the endo-/exo-character of these enzymes often is assessed by studying the degradation of oligomeric substrates, and that several recent studies have shown this method to be invalid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Family 18 chitinases break down all forms of chitin at varying rates depending on the enzyme and the substrate. They also act on chitosan with degrees of acetylation as low as 13 % &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sorbotten2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and some are known to degrade peptidoglycan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Studies on family 18 chitinases from ''Serratia marcescens'' have suggested that most subsites for sugar binding show some promiscuity with the notable exception of subsite -1 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
GH18 enzymes perform enzymic catalysis with [[retaining|retention]] of anomeric configuration. They belong to a growing group of enzymes (now including  GH families 18, [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 20|20]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 25|25]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 56|56]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 84|84]], and [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 85|85]]) that perform catalysis using a double-displacement reaction but instead of the more common enzyme-derived nucleophile they utilize the ''N''-acetamido carbonyl oxygen in what is termed [[neighboring group participation]] (or substrate participation or anchimeric assistance). Figures showing such a mechanism date back to Koshland's 1953 review &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Koshland1953&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;; indeed they frequent the chemical literature of participating groups long before that, but it is primarily through the work on GH18 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and soon after [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996,Armand1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; that such a mechanism became well established. In such a mechanism, which occurs with (net) retention of anomeric configuration, the enzyme provides a [[general acid]] function to protonate the leaving group to facilitate its departure with the substrate carbonyl oxygen playing the role of nucleophile to generate a bicyclic &amp;quot;[[oxazolinium ion]]&amp;quot; [[intermediate]], which subsequently breaks down following the microscopic reverse ''via'' hydrolysis or occasionally transglycosylation).  Such a mechanism has a number of facets, one of which is its potential inhibition using thiazolines &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Macdonald&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Allosamidin, a pseudotrisaccharide consisting of two ''N''-acetylallosamine sugars linked to an allosamizoline moiety &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sakuda1987&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is a well known natural compound that is a high affinity inhibitor of family 18 chitinases (see Figure).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:allosamidin.png|thumb|right|400px|'''Oxazolinium ion intermediate (A) and allosamidin (B).''']] Like in many other enzymes acting on polysaccharides the substrate-binding clefts of processive family 18 chitinases are lined with aromatic residues. Family 18 chitinases have proven very useful to gain insight into the structural basis of a processive mechanism an in the importance of such a mechanism for biomass-converting efficiency &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Eijsink2008,Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As previously suggested for cellulases in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Varrot2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, aromatic residues close to the catalytic center play a crucial role in processivity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006b&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytically-active GH18 enzymes use a double displacement reaction mechanism with [[neighboring group participation]](see Figure). In this mechanism the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate acts as a nucleophile, with assistance from a carboxylate (Asp) that acts to deprotonate the ''N''-acetamido nitrogen during [[oxazolinium ion]] formation/breakdown. A second catalytic acid residue (glutamate in family GH18, but often also Asp in other families using this mechanism, except for [[GH85]] where this residue is an amide) acts as a general acid/base to protonate the glycosidic oxygen to assist in the departure of the aglycon, and to deprotonate the nucleophilic water molecule during the hydrolysis of the [[oxazolinium ion]] [[intermediate]].  In family GH18 the two catalytic carboxylates are found in an D-X-E motif whereas in other families the carboxylates may be adjacent, such as the DD motif in family [[GH84]] (for example see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).  The physical separation of the two catalytic residues (with the second not in a position to act as a nucleophile itself) has led to confusion in some literature that GH18 and other enzymes (notably [[GH25]]) may be inverting enzymes; this is certainly not the case for GH18 and is unlikely to be the case for [[GH25]].[[Image:mechanism.jpg|thumb|right|1000px|'''Catalytic mechanism of family 18 chitinases.''' The picture shows the mechanism proposed for ChiB from ''Serratia marcescens''. Panel c shows the oxazolium ion intermediate which is to be hydrolyzed by an incoming water molecule. The picture is taken from&amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D-X-E motif is part of a diagnostic D-X-X-''D''-X-D-X-E motif that includes two more aspartates of which the one in italics is known to be essential for catalytic activity. There are several other conserved residues in the catalytic center that play important roles during catalysis, related to distortion of the -1 sugar, activation of the acetamido group and/or cycling of the p''K''a of the catalytic glutamate &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Synstad2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The O6 of the –1 sugar interacts with the side chain of yet another semi-conserved aspartate (Asp215 in the Figure). In enzymes with an acidic pH optimum this residue is an asparagine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Catalytically inactive members ===&lt;br /&gt;
One unusual of feature of plant members of the GH18 family is the large number of sequences that encode catalytically-inactive proteins that function as enzyme inhibitors or lectins. Phylogenetic analysis of the plant GH18 family reveals clear distinction between hevamine-type chitinases, putative chitinases and narbonins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Durand2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Out of the major subfamilies, only the one that contains hevamine contains enzymes of demonstrated activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The subfamily of GH18 that contains xylanase inhibitor proteins (XIP) emerged from the hevamine cluster along with concanavalin B. All have non-conservative substitutions of one of the acidic amino acid residues in the catalytic region. In the structure of concanavalin B the catalytic Glu residue is replaced by Gln &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Henniga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which mostly accounts for the lack of chitinase activity reported for this protein. The XIP-type inhibitors all have the third aspartic acid DxxDxDxE mutated into an aromatic residue whereas the catalytic glutamate residue is only conserved in the prototype of cereal xylanase inhibitors, XIP-I (isolated from ''Triticum aetivum'') &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In XIP-I and narbonin, the glutamic acid residues are present in an equivalent position to the catalytic residue in hevamine, but their side chain is fully engaged in salt bridges with neighbouring arginine residues &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, preventing chitinase activity despite the presence of the catalytic residue. Furthermore in both XIP-I and narbonin, the position equivalent to residue Asp in hevamine, which has been proposed to stabilize the positively charged [[oxazolinium ion]] reaction [[intermediate]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is occupied by a bulky residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The mutation of this Asp residue in alanine in hevamine led to a mutant with approx. 2% residual activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The most striking disruption of the cleft in XIP-I and narbonin is caused by the mutation of subsite -1 Gly which participates in the hydrogen-bonding network with the ligand &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;ATVA1 TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, resulting in complete obstruction of subsite -1 and preventing access to the catalytic residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Xylanase inhibitors appeared after the emergence of the various subfamilies of chitinases from their common ancestor. In this respect, the xylanase inhibitors are a relatively new acquisition, and so far no protein has been reported to display both xylanase inhibition and chitinase activities. GH18 XIP-type inhibitors can inhibit xylanases from [[GH10]] and [[GH11]] families &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The inhibition specificity of the GH18 xylanase inhibitors can be explained on the basis of the solved 3-D structure of XIP-I in complex with a [[GH10]] xylanase from ''A. nidulans'' and a [[GH11]] xylanase from ''P. funiculosum'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ChiAB.jpg|thumb|right|500px|'''Structures of ChiA (left) and ChiB (right) from ''Serratia marcescens''.''' Panels A and B show C-alpha traces of the complete two-domain enzymes, with a substrate-binding non-catalytic domain pointing to the upper left (A) or lower right (B). The side chains of aromatic residues (possibly) involved in polysaccharide binding are shown in dark blue, whereas the side chain of the acid/base catalytic glutamate is shown in green. Panel C shows details of ChiA in complex with an chito-octamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1ehn 1ehn]) and panel D shows details of ChiB in complex with a chito-pentamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1e6n 1e6n]). Subsites are numbered. This picture was taken from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although these enzymes are frequently multi-modular, the catalytic domains are &amp;amp;alpha; / &amp;amp;beta; barrels &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. While several structures for complete bi-modular chitinases are available &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,Aalten2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (see Figure), available structural information for multi-modular enzymes is often limited to the isolated catalytic domain.&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the conformational itinerary of catalysis which is extremely similar to other [[retaining]] enzymes active on ''gluco''-configured substrates, was provided by the van Aalten group &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; in 2001 through the trapping of a distorted Michaelis complex in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1,4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''B'' conformation and thus extremely similar to the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''S''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; skew boats observed in [[GH5]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Davies1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for example or the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;E conformation originally seen for a &amp;quot;neighboring group&amp;quot; enzyme in [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. More recently, a similar conformation has been observed for the Michaelis complex of another neighboring group enzyme, the [[GH84]] O-GlcNAcase &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Fungal GH18 enzymes are considered as possible therapeutic targets and a number of programmes are probing this area (for example &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Housten2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First sterochemistry determination: Sometimes '''incorrectly''' reported as inverting, this family performs catalysis with '''retention''' of anomeric configuration as first shown on the ''Bacillus ciculans'' enzyme &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Armand1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[catalytic nucleophile]] identification: This family is one of many that uses neighbouring group participation for catalysis with the N-acetyl carbonyl group acting as the nucleophile; first proposed (we believe) for this family in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[general acid/base]] residue identification: On the basis of 3-D structure &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: The first two 3-D structures for catalytically active GH18 members were  the ''Serratia marcescens'' chitinase A and the plant defence protein hevamine published &amp;quot;back-to-back&amp;quot; in ''Structure'' in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  In retrospect, however, the non-catalytic &amp;quot;narbonin&amp;quot; structure was arguably the first GH18 3-D structure, although it is has no enzymatic activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennig1993&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Perrakis pmid=7704527&lt;br /&gt;
#ATVA1 pmid=7704528&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1994 pmid=8168626&lt;br /&gt;
#Koshland1953  Koshland, D. (1953) Biol. Rev. 28, 416.&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1997 pmid=9396742&lt;br /&gt;
#Housten2002 pmid=12093900&lt;br /&gt;
#Tews1996 pmid=8673609&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Macdonald pmid=20209544&lt;br /&gt;
#He2010 pmid=20067256&lt;br /&gt;
#Davies1998 pmid=9718293&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2003   pmid=12775711&lt;br /&gt;
#Henniga1995 pmid=7490746&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennig1993 pmid=1628747&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennigb1995 pmid=15299319&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1996 pmid=8831791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma2002 pmid=11846790&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2003 pmid=12617724&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2004 pmid=15181003&lt;br /&gt;
#Juge2004 pmid=14871661&lt;br /&gt;
#Durand2005 pmid=15794761&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1995 pmid=7495789&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006a pmid=16420473&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006b pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Sorbotten2005 pmid=15654891&lt;br /&gt;
#Varrot2003 pmid=12842048&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma1997 pmid=9271197&lt;br /&gt;
#Eijsink2008 pmid=18367275&lt;br /&gt;
#Hult2005 pmid=15717865&lt;br /&gt;
#Aalten2000 pmid=7675786&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Synstad2004 pmid=14717693&lt;br /&gt;
#Sakuda1987 pmid=3570982&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Glycoside Hydrolase Families|GH018]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6040</id>
		<title>Glycoside Hydrolase Family 18</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.cazypedia.org/index.php?title=Glycoside_Hydrolase_Family_18&amp;diff=6040"/>
		<updated>2010-11-05T16:56:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vincent Eijsink: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!-- CURATORS: Please replace the {{UnderConstruction}} tag below with {{CuratorApproved}} when the page is ready for wider public consumption --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{CuratorApproved}}&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Author]]s: ^^^Gideon Davies^^^, ^^^Nathalie Juge^^^, ^^^Vincent Eijsink^^^&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Responsible Curator]]:  ^^^Gideon Davies^^^&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The data in the table below should be updated by the Author/Curator according to current information on the family --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| {{Prettytable}} &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH18'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Clan'''    &lt;br /&gt;
|GH-K&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Mechanism'''&lt;br /&gt;
|retaining&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Active site residues'''&lt;br /&gt;
|known (acid/neighbouring group)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Hl2}} colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; |'''CAZy DB link'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |http://www.cazy.org/fam/GH18.html&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- This is the end of the table --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Substrate specificities ==&lt;br /&gt;
Family GH18 is unusual in having [[glycoside hydrolases]] that are both catalytically active chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (EC 3.2.1.96) and also sub-families of non-hydrolytic proteins that function as carbohydrate binding modules / &amp;quot;lectins&amp;quot; or as xylanase inhibitors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active chitinases comprise non-processive endo-acting enzymes as well as processive enzymes with exo- and endo-binding preferences &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006a,Hult2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Most enzymes primarily produce chitobiose, but some endo-acting family 18 chitinases are not capable to cleave trimers or tetramers and thus yield longer products. Note that in older literature the endo-/exo-character of these enzymes often is assessed by studying the degradation of oligomeric substrates, and that several recent studies have shown this method to be invalid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Family 18 chitinases break down all forms of chitin at varying rates depending on the enzyme and the substrate. They also act on chitosan with degrees of acetylation as low as 13 % &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sorbotten2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and some are known to degrade peptidoglycan &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Studies on family 18 chitinases from ''Serratia marcescens'' have suggested that most subsites for sugar binding show some promiscuity with the notable exception of subsite -1 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kinetics and Mechanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
GH18 enzymes perform enzymic catalysis with [[retaining|retention]] of anomeric configuration. They belong to a growing group of enzymes (now including  GH families 18, [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 20|20]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 25|25]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 56|56]], [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 84|84]], and [[Glycoside Hydrolase Family 85|85]]) that perform catalysis using a double-displacement reaction but instead of the more common enzyme-derived nucleophile they utilize the ''N''-acetamido carbonyl oxygen in what is termed [[neighboring group participation]] (or substrate participation or anchimeric assistance). Figures showing such a mechanism date back to Koshland's 1953 review &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Koshland1953&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;; indeed they frequent the chemical literature of participating groups long before that, but it is primarily through the work on GH18 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; and soon after [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996,Armand1997&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; that such a mechanism became well established. In such a mechanism, which occurs with (net) retention of anomeric configuration, the enzyme provides a [[general acid]] function to protonate the leaving group to facilitate its departure with the substrate carbonyl oxygen playing the role of nucleophile to generate a bicyclic &amp;quot;[[oxazolinium ion]]&amp;quot; [[intermediate]], which subsequently breaks down following the microscopic reverse ''via'' hydrolysis or occasionally transglycosylation).  Such a mechanism has a number of facets, one of which is its potential inhibition using thiazolines &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Macdonald&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Allosamidin, a pseudotrisaccharide consisting of two ''N''-acetylallosamine sugars linked to an allosamizoline moiety &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Sakuda1987&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is a well known natural compound that is a high affinity inhibitor of family 18 chitinases (see Figure).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:allosamidin.png|thumb|right|400px|'''Oxazolinium ion intermediate (A) and allosamidin (B).''']] Like in many other enzymes acting on polysaccharides the substrate-binding clefts of processive family 18 chitinases are lined with aromatic residues. Family 18 chitinases have proven very useful to gain insight into the structural basis of a processive mechanism an in the importance of such a mechanism for biomass-converting efficiency &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Eijsink2008,Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. As previously suggested for cellulases in e.g. &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Varrot2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, aromatic residues close to the catalytic center play a crucial role in processivity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Horn2006b&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Catalytic Residues ==&lt;br /&gt;
The catalytically-active GH18 enzymes use a double displacement reaction mechanism with [[neighboring group participation]](see Figure). In this mechanism the carbonyl oxygen of the substrate acts as a nucleophile, with assistance from a carboxylate (Asp) that acts to deprotonate the ''N''-acetamido nitrogen during [[oxazolinium ion]] formation/breakdown. A second catalytic acid residue (glutamate in family GH18, but often also Asp in other families using this mechanism, except for [[GH85]] where this residue is an amide) acts as a general acid/base to protonate the glycosidic oxygen to assist in the departure of the aglycon, and to deprotonate the nucleophilic water molecule during the hydrolysis of the [[oxazolinium ion]] [[intermediate]].  In family GH18 the two catalytic carboxylates are found in an D-X-E motif whereas in other families the carboxylates may be adjacent, such as the DD motif in family [[GH84]] (for example see &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).  The physical separation of the two catalytic residues (with the second not in a position to act as a nucleophile itself) has led to confusion in some literature that GH18 and other enzymes (notably [[GH25]]) may be inverting enzymes; this is certainly not the case for GH18 and is unlikely to be the case for [[GH25]].[[Image:mechanism.jpg|thumb|right|1000px|'''Catalytic mechanism of family 18 chitinases.''' The picture shows the mechanism proposed for ChiB from ''Serratia marcescens''. Panel c shows the oxazolium ion intermediate which is to be hydrolyzed by an incoming water molecule. The picture is taken from&amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The D-X-E motif is part of a diagnostic D-X-X-''D''-X-D-X-E motif that includes two more aspartates of which the one in italics is known to be essential for catalytic activity. There are several other conserved residues in the catalytic center that play important roles during catalysis, related to distortion of the -1 sugar, activation of the acetamido group and/or cycling of the p''K''a of the catalytic glutamate &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Synstad2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The O6 of the –1 sugar interacts with the side chain of yet another semi-conserved aspartate (Asp215 in the Figure). In enzymes with an acidic pH optimum this residue is an asparagine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Catalytically inactive members ===&lt;br /&gt;
One unusual of feature of plant members of the GH18 family is the large number of sequences that encode catalytically-inactive proteins that function as enzyme inhibitors or lectins. Phylogenetic analysis of the plant GH18 family reveals clear distinction between hevamine-type chitinases, putative chitinases and narbonins &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Durand2005&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Out of the major subfamilies, only the one that contains hevamine contains enzymes of demonstrated activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt; TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The subfamily of GH18 that contains xylanase inhibitor proteins (XIP) emerged from the hevamine cluster along with concanavalin B. All have non-conservative substitutions of one of the acidic amino acid residues in the catalytic region. In the structure of concanavalin B the catalytic Glu residue is replaced by Gln &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Henniga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, which mostly accounts for the lack of chitinase activity reported for this protein. The XIP-type inhibitors all have the third aspartic acid DxxDxDxE mutated into an aromatic residue whereas the catalytic glutamate residue is only conserved in the prototype of cereal xylanase inhibitors, XIP-I (isolated from ''Triticum aetivum'') &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. In XIP-I and narbonin, the glutamic acid residues are present in an equivalent position to the catalytic residue in hevamine, but their side chain is fully engaged in salt bridges with neighbouring arginine residues &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, preventing chitinase activity despite the presence of the catalytic residue. Furthermore in both XIP-I and narbonin, the position equivalent to residue Asp in hevamine, which has been proposed to stabilize the positively charged [[oxazolinium ion]] reaction [[intermediate]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, is occupied by a bulky residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennigb1995 Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The mutation of this Asp residue in alanine in hevamine led to a mutant with approx. 2% residual activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Bokma2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The most striking disruption of the cleft in XIP-I and narbonin is caused by the mutation of subsite -1 Gly which participates in the hydrogen-bonding network with the ligand &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;ATVA1 TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;, resulting in complete obstruction of subsite -1 and preventing access to the catalytic residue &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2003&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Xylanase inhibitors appeared after the emergence of the various subfamilies of chitinases from their common ancestor. In this respect, the xylanase inhibitors are a relatively new acquisition, and so far no protein has been reported to display both xylanase inhibition and chitinase activities. GH18 XIP-type inhibitors can inhibit xylanases from [[GH10]] and [[GH11]] families &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Juge2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. The inhibition specificity of the GH18 xylanase inhibitors can be explained on the basis of the solved 3-D structure of XIP-I in complex with a [[GH10]] xylanase from ''A. nidulans'' and a [[GH11]] xylanase from ''P. funiculosum'' &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Payan2004&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three-dimensional structures ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:ChiAB.jpg|thumb|right|500px|'''Structures of ChiA (left) and ChiB (right) from ''Serratia marcescens''.''' Panels A and B show C-alpha traces of the complete two-domain enzymes, with a substrate-binding non-catalytic domain pointing to the upper left (A) or lower right (B). The side chains of aromatic residues (possibly) involved in polysaccharide binding are shown in dark blue, whereas the side chain of the acid/base catalytic glutamate is shown in green. Panel C shows details of ChiA in complex with an chito-octamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1ehn 1ehn]) and panel D shows details of ChiB in complex with a chito-pentamer (PDB ID[{{PDBlink}}1e6n 1e6n]). Subsites are numbered. This picture was taken from &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Zakariassen2009&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although these enzymes are frequently multi-modular, the catalytic domains are &amp;amp;alpha; / &amp;amp;beta; barrels &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. While several structures for complete bi-modular chitinases are available &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,Aalten2000&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; (see Figure), available structural information for multi-modular enzymes is often limited to the isolated catalytic domain.&lt;br /&gt;
Work on the conformational itinerary of catalysis which is extremely similar to other [[retaining]] enzymes active on ''gluco''-configured substrates, was provided by the van Aalten group &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Daan2001&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; in 2001 through the trapping of a distorted Michaelis complex in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1,4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''B'' conformation and thus extremely similar to the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;''S''&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; skew boats observed in [[GH5]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Davies1998&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt; for example or the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;E conformation originally seen for a &amp;quot;neighboring group&amp;quot; enzyme in [[GH20]] &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Tews1996&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. More recently, a similar conformation has been observed for the Michaelis complex of another neighboring group enzyme, the [[GH84]] O-GlcNAcase &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;He2010&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;. Fungal GH18 enzymes are considered as possible therapeutic targets and a number of programmes are probing this area (for example &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Housten2002&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Firsts ==&lt;br /&gt;
;First sterochemistry determination: Sometimes '''incorrectly''' reported as inverting, this family performs catalysis with '''retention''' of anomeric configuration as first shown on the ''Bacillus ciculans'' enzyme &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Armand1994&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[catalytic nucleophile]] identification: This family is one of many that uses neighbouring group participation for catalysis with the N-acetyl carbonyl group acting as the nucleophile; first proposed (we believe) for this family in &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;TerwisschavanScheltinga1995&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First [[general acid/base]] residue identification: On the basis of 3-D structure &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
;First 3-D structure: The first two 3-D structures for catalytically active GH18 members were  the ''Serratia marcescens'' chitinase A and the plant defence protein hevamine published &amp;quot;back-to-back&amp;quot; in ''Structure'' in 1994 &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Perrakis,ATVA1&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.  In retrospect, however, the non-catalytic &amp;quot;narbonin&amp;quot; structure was arguably the first GH18 3-D structure, although it is has no enzymatic activity &amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;Hennig1993&amp;lt;/cite&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Perrakis pmid=7704527&lt;br /&gt;
#ATVA1 pmid=7704528&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1994 pmid=8168626&lt;br /&gt;
#Koshland1953  Koshland, D. (1953) Biol. Rev. 28, 416.&lt;br /&gt;
#Armand1997 pmid=9396742&lt;br /&gt;
#Housten2002 pmid=12093900&lt;br /&gt;
#Tews1996 pmid=8673609&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2001 pmid=11481469&lt;br /&gt;
#Macdonald pmid=20209544&lt;br /&gt;
#He2010 pmid=20067256&lt;br /&gt;
#Davies1998 pmid=9718293&lt;br /&gt;
#Daan2003   pmid=12775711&lt;br /&gt;
#Henniga1995 pmid=7490746&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennig1993 pmid=1628747&lt;br /&gt;
#Hennigb1995 pmid=15299319&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1996 pmid=8831791&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma2002 pmid=11846790&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2003 pmid=12617724&lt;br /&gt;
#Payan2004 pmid=15181003&lt;br /&gt;
#Juge2004 pmid=14871661&lt;br /&gt;
#Durand2005 pmid=15794761&lt;br /&gt;
#TerwisschavanScheltinga1995 pmid=7495789&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006a pmid=16420473&lt;br /&gt;
#Horn2006b pmid=17116887&lt;br /&gt;
#Sorbotten2005 pmid=15654891&lt;br /&gt;
#Varrot2003 pmid=12842048&lt;br /&gt;
#Bokma1997 pmid=9271197&lt;br /&gt;
#Eijsink2008 pmid=18367275&lt;br /&gt;
#Hult2005 pmid=15717865&lt;br /&gt;
#Aalten2000 pmid=7675786&lt;br /&gt;
#Zakariassen2009 pmid=19244232&lt;br /&gt;
#Synstad2004 pmid=14717693&lt;br /&gt;
#Sakuda1987 pmid=3570982&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/biblio&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Glycoside Hydrolase Families|GH018]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vincent Eijsink</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>