CAZypedia needs your input! We have many unassigned GH, PL, CE, AA, GT, and CBM pages in need of Authors and Responsible Curators.
Scientists at all career stages, including students, are welcome to contribute to CAZypedia. Read more here, and in the 10th anniversary article in Glycobiology.
New to the CAZy classification? Read this first.

Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 32

From CAZypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Approve icon-50px.png

This page has been approved by the Responsible Curator as essentially complete. CAZypedia is a living document, so further improvement of this page is still possible. If you would like to suggest an addition or correction, please contact the page's Responsible Curator directly by e-mail.

CAZy DB link

Ligand specificities

In 1994, the first structure of a carbohydrate-binding module of family 32, in complex with D-galactose, was determined from a fungal galactose oxidase [1]. Following that, a CBM32 from a multi-modular sialidase produced by Micromonospora viridifaciens was shown to demonstrate galactose and lactose binding specificity [2, 3]. A CBM32 from a Cellvibrio mixtus family 16 glycoside hydrolase binds laminarin and pustulan [4], while a CBM32 from a Clostridium thermocellum mannanase has demonstrable binding on the non-reducing end of β-mannans and β-1,4-linked mannooligosaccharides [5]. A periplasmic-binding protein, YeCBM32, from Yersinia enterolitica shares sequence identity with the CBM32 family and binds the polygalaturonic acid components of pectin [6]. A CBM32 from Persicobacter sp alginate lyase AlyQ binds 4,5-unsaturated mannuronic acid of the non-reducing end of alginate oligosaccharides[7]. The Clostridium perfringens CBM32s have been well studied and many of their ligand specificities were determined as follows: D-galactose, N-acetyl-D-galactosamine [8, 9, 10], D-galactose-β-1,4-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (LacNAc), L-fucose-α-1,2-D-galactose-β-1,4-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (type II blood group H-trisaccharide) [10], N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine-β-1,3-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine-β-1,2-D-mannose, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine-β-1,3-D-mannose (non-biological) [11], and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine-α-1,4-D-galactose [9]. Some members of CBM family 32 have exhibited a degree of substrate promiscuity; these include CpCBM32-2 from the NagH enzyme and CpCBM32C from the NagJ enzyme of Clostridium perfringens [10, 11]. This CBM family has a very diverse set of ligand specificities that is reflected in the notable amino acid sequence divergence throughout the family [12].

Structural Features

Figure 1. A secondary structure representation of the C. perfringens NagJ CpCBM32C 2J1e showing the tryptophan platform, found in the terminal loop region, interacting with D-galactose from LacNac. A calcium is shown as a grey sphere.

The CBM32s share the common beta sandwich fold and have a bound structural metal ion that is most often attributed to be calcium [13]. Most family members have fairly weak binding affinities (Ka values in the mM-1 and low μM-1 range) [5, 10, 11]. These binding site are located at the terminal loop region within the CBM32 family. The binding sites are, in some cases, quite shallow and designed to bind monosaccharides or short oligosaccharides, making these type C CBMs [8, 9, 10, 11]. Variability within the apical loop region within the family confers the different ligand specificities. Characteristically, there is one residue, commonly Trp but also Tyr, which provides an important hydrophobic platform for interaction with the ring of one of the sugar moieties (Figure 1) [2, 9, 10]. In most cases, the CBM32 members interact with the saturated non-reducing end of oligosaccharides [5, 8, 9, 10, 11]. However, this is not always the case, as demonstrated by the periplasmic-binding protein from Y. enterocolitica, which shares sequence identity with the CBM32 family [14] and binds polygalacturonic acid polymers [6] or the CBM32 domain of the alginate lyase AlyQ which specifically recognizes a 4,5-unsaturated uronic acid residue at the non-reducing end[7].

Some structural examples of the complex oligosaccharide binding sites of the CBM32s can be found in the following PDB entries: 1EUU [2], 7D29[7],2J7M [10], 4A45 [9], 4A6O [9], and 2W1U [11], to name just a few. An updated list of available three-dimensional structures is available on the CBM32 page of the CAZy Database.


CBMs, in general, are thought to target pendant catalytic modules to their respective substrates. CtCBM32 from a C. thermocellum manannase potentiates the hydrolytic function of the enzyme and prevents transglycosylation reactions by preferentially binding the non-reducing end of β-mannans. Thus, the CBM32 may sterically block the access of longer manno-oligosaccharide acceptor molecules to the enzyme active site thereby enhancing hydrolysis and affecting the products of catalysis [5]. CBM32s from the Gram positive pathogen C. perfringens may well have a dual role as many of the enzymes containing CBM32s have an LPXTG motif at their C-terminal end, which generally signals for sortase-mediated anchoring to the bacterial cell wall [15]. Thus, not only would the catalytic modules be targeted to substrate, but also the bacterium as a whole, suggesting an adhesin-like activity for these CBMs [16].

The types of catalytic modules that the CBM32 members are associated with vary widely and include sialidases [8], β-N-acetylglucosaminidases [17], α-N-acetylglucosaminidases [18], alginate lyases [7], mannanases [5] and galactose oxidases [1]. In enteric bacteria the CBM32 motif may occur more than once in the same enzyme and they may or may not share the same ligand specifities; this suggests the possibility of heterogenic multivalent binding events [8, 9, 12]. Other modules that may be associated in the same enzymes are different families of CBMs, FNIII domains, and cohesin and dockerin domains [9, 16, 19, 20]. There are now examples of CBM32s that are independent of a catalytic module, such as the YeCBM32 periplasmic-binding protein [6].

The ligand binding loops from CpCBM32-2 from the NagH enzyme were modified to create polyol-responsive antibody mimetics for affinity purification of specific proteins [21], this is an unusual biotechnological application for a CBM and it speaks to the plasticity within the loop binding region.

Family Firsts

First Identified
The galactose-binding function of CBM32 was first suggested by crystallography of a galactose oxidase from the fungus Fusarium graminearum [1] (previously Dactylium dendroides [22]).
First Structural Characterization
In 1991, the first crystal structures of a galactose oxidase from the fungus F. graminearum (e.g. PDB ID 1GOF) revealed an N-terminal CBM32, although this study did not explore the carbohydrate-binding function of this module [23]. The first available complex structure of a CBM32 is from the same galactose oxidase soaked with galactose [1]; unfortunately, a corresponding entry in the RCSB Protein Data Bank is lacking.


  1. Ito N, Phillips SE, Yadav KD, and Knowles PF. (1994). Crystal structure of a free radical enzyme, galactose oxidase. J Mol Biol. 1994;238(5):794-814. DOI:10.1006/jmbi.1994.1335 | PubMed ID:8182749 [Ito1994]
  2. Gaskell A, Crennell S, and Taylor G. (1995). The three domains of a bacterial sialidase: a beta-propeller, an immunoglobulin module and a galactose-binding jelly-roll. Structure. 1995;3(11):1197-205. DOI:10.1016/s0969-2126(01)00255-6 | PubMed ID:8591030 [Gaskell1995]
  3. Newstead SL, Watson JN, Bennet AJ, and Taylor G. (2005). Galactose recognition by the carbohydrate-binding module of a bacterial sialidase. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2005;61(Pt 11):1483-91. DOI:10.1107/S0907444905026132 | PubMed ID:16239725 [Newstead2005]
  4. Centeno MS, Goyal A, Prates JA, Ferreira LM, Gilbert HJ, and Fontes CM. (2006). Novel modular enzymes encoded by a cellulase gene cluster in Cellvibrio mixtus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;265(1):26-34. DOI:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00464.x | PubMed ID:17005007 [Centeno2006]
  5. Mizutani K, Fernandes VO, Karita S, Luís AS, Sakka M, Kimura T, Jackson A, Zhang X, Fontes CM, Gilbert HJ, and Sakka K. (2012). Influence of a mannan binding family 32 carbohydrate binding module on the activity of the appended mannanase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(14):4781-7. DOI:10.1128/AEM.07457-11 | PubMed ID:22562994 [Mizutani2012]
  6. Abbott DW, Hrynuik S, and Boraston AB. (2007). Identification and characterization of a novel periplasmic polygalacturonic acid binding protein from Yersinia enterolitica. J Mol Biol. 2007;367(4):1023-33. DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.01.030 | PubMed ID:17292916 [Abbott2007]
  7. Teh AH, Sim PF, and Hisano T. (2020). Structural basis for binding uronic acids by family 32 carbohydrate-binding modules. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;533(3):257-261. DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.09.064 | PubMed ID:33010888 [Teh2020]
  8. Boraston AB, Ficko-Blean E, and Healey M. (2007). Carbohydrate recognition by a large sialidase toxin from Clostridium perfringens. Biochemistry. 2007;46(40):11352-60. DOI:10.1021/bi701317g | PubMed ID:17850114 [Boraston2007]
  9. Ficko-Blean E, Stuart CP, Suits MD, Cid M, Tessier M, Woods RJ, and Boraston AB. (2012). Carbohydrate recognition by an architecturally complex α-N-acetylglucosaminidase from Clostridium perfringens. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33524. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0033524 | PubMed ID:22479408 [Ficko-Blean2012]
  10. Ficko-Blean E and Boraston AB. (2006). The interaction of a carbohydrate-binding module from a Clostridium perfringens N-acetyl-beta-hexosaminidase with its carbohydrate receptor. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(49):37748-57. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M606126200 | PubMed ID:16990278 [Ficko-Blean2006]
  11. Ficko-Blean E and Boraston AB. (2009). N-acetylglucosamine recognition by a family 32 carbohydrate-binding module from Clostridium perfringens NagH. J Mol Biol. 2009;390(2):208-20. DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.066 | PubMed ID:19422833 [Ficko-Blean2009]
  12. Abbott DW, Eirín-López JM, and Boraston AB. (2008). Insight into ligand diversity and novel biological roles for family 32 carbohydrate-binding modules. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25(1):155-67. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msm243 | PubMed ID:18032406 [AbbottMolBiolEvol]
  13. Mazmanian SK, Liu G, Ton-That H, and Schneewind O. (1999). Staphylococcus aureus sortase, an enzyme that anchors surface proteins to the cell wall. Science. 1999;285(5428):760-3. DOI:10.1126/science.285.5428.760 | PubMed ID:10427003 [Mazmanian1999]
  14. Ficko-Blean E, Gregg KJ, Adams JJ, Hehemann JH, Czjzek M, Smith SP, and Boraston AB. (2009). Portrait of an enzyme, a complete structural analysis of a multimodular {beta}-N-acetylglucosaminidase from Clostridium perfringens. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(15):9876-84. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M808954200 | PubMed ID:19193644 [Ficko-BleanPortraitOfAnEnzyme]
  15. Rao FV, Dorfmueller HC, Villa F, Allwood M, Eggleston IM, and van Aalten DM. (2006). Structural insights into the mechanism and inhibition of eukaryotic O-GlcNAc hydrolysis. EMBO J. 2006;25(7):1569-78. DOI:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601026 | PubMed ID:16541109 [Rao]
  16. Ficko-Blean E and Boraston AB. (2012). Structural analysis of a bacterial exo-α-D-N-acetylglucosaminidase in complex with an unusual disaccharide found in class III mucin. Glycobiology. 2012;22(5):590-5. DOI:10.1093/glycob/cwr165 | PubMed ID:22090394 [Ficko-BleanGH89]
  17. Chitayat S, Gregg K, Adams JJ, Ficko-Blean E, Bayer EA, Boraston AB, and Smith SP. (2008). Three-dimensional structure of a putative non-cellulosomal cohesin module from a Clostridium perfringens family 84 glycoside hydrolase. J Mol Biol. 2008;375(1):20-8. DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.031 | PubMed ID:17999932 [Chitayat2008]
  18. Adams JJ, Gregg K, Bayer EA, Boraston AB, and Smith SP. (2008). Structural basis of Clostridium perfringens toxin complex formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(34):12194-9. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0803154105 | PubMed ID:18716000 [Adams2008]
  19. Suderman RJ, Rice DA, Gibson SD, Strick EJ, and Chao DM. (2017). Development of polyol-responsive antibody mimetics for single-step protein purification. Protein Expr Purif. 2017;134:114-124. DOI:10.1016/j.pep.2017.04.008 | PubMed ID:28428153 [Suderman2017]
  20. Ögel, Z.B. Brayford, D. and McPherson, M.J. (1994) Cellulose-Triggered Sporulation in the Galactose Oxidase-Producing Fungus Cladobotryum (Dactylium) Dendroides Nrrl-2903 and Its Reidentification as a Species of Fusarium. Mycological Research, 98(4):474-480. DOI:10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81207-0

  21. Ito N, Phillips SE, Stevens C, Ogel ZB, McPherson MJ, Keen JN, Yadav KD, and Knowles PF. (1991). Novel thioether bond revealed by a 1.7 A crystal structure of galactose oxidase. Nature. 1991;350(6313):87-90. DOI:10.1038/350087a0 | PubMed ID:2002850 [Ito1991]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed