New to the CAZy classification? Read this first.
Want to learn more about CAZypedia? Read the CAZypedia 10th anniversary article in Glycobiology.

Carbohydrate Binding Module Family 78

From CAZypedia
Revision as of 07:38, 22 February 2018 by Harry Gilbert (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search
Under construction icon-blue-48px.png
This page is currently under construction. This means that the Responsible Curator has deemed that the page's content is not quite up to CAZypedia's standards for full public consumption. All information should be considered to be under revision and may be subject to major changes.

CAZy DB link
http://www.cazy.org/CBM78.html

Ligand specificities

CBM78 is a family identified in the Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome (a lignocellulose degrading multienzyme complex; see Fontes2010 for a review of cellulosomes), a ruminal cellulolytic bacterium [1]. The only characterized CBM78 modules are CBM78RfGH5 and CBM78RfGH26, which components of enzymes containing catalytic modules derived from GH5_4 and GH26, respectively. Both CBM78 modules bind to β-1,4- and mixed linked β-1,3-1,4-glucans, however,CBM78RfGH26, also binds galactomannan. and contains a GH26 “β1,4-mannanase” catalytic module [2]. CBM78RfGH5 displays highest affinity for xyloglucan. The similar affinity of CBM78RfGH5 for cellohexaose and cellopentaose suggests five dominant sugar binding sites. The higher affinity of CBM78RfGH5 for the xyloglucan derived oligosaccharide XXXG (where X is a backbone glucose decorated with xylose and G is an unsubstituted glucose) than cellotetraose suggests recognition of the xylose side chains. No binding to regenerated (noncrystalline) insoluble cellulose (RC) was detected. Isothermal titration calorimetry showed that ligand binding was enthalpically driven and coverage of polysaccharides at saturation indicated an endo-mode of binding. CBM78 is thus a type B CBM family.

Structural Features

Figure 1. Crystal structure of CBM78RfGH5. (PDB ID 4VI7). The aromatic residues that contribute to ligand recognition are shown.

The structure of CBM78RfGH5 was solved using single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) methods and selenomethionyl protein to a resolution of 2.0 Å. CBM78RfGH5 has a β-sandwich fold and contains two β-sheets, 1 and 2, respectively (Figure 1) [2]. β-sheet 2 forms a cleft in which aromatic residues are a dominant feature, typical of many type B CBM families (see Boraston2004 for review). Trp496, Trp554, Tyr555, and Phe479 are aligned along the cleft. This hydrophobic region is the glucan binding site in CBM78RfGH5 [2].

Functionalities

CBM78 modules play an enzyme-targeting role that is specific to the Ruminococcus, which has a particularly complex repertoire of scaffoldins (cellulosome assembly proteins). The specificity of CBM78RfGH5 for β-glucans is consistent with the endo-β1,4-glucanases activity of the cognate GH5_4 catalytic module. Similarly, the capacity of CBM78RfGH5 to bind β-mannan is consistent with the appended GH26 catalytic module, which contains predominantly β1,4-mannanases. Mutagenesis experiments confirmed the importance of the aromatic residues in ligand recognition of CBM78RfGH5. Alanine substitution of Trp496 or Trp554 in CBM78RfGH5, which are conserved in the CBM family, resulted in complete loss of binding to all ligands. The mutants F479A and Y555A bound to xyloglucan, but not to barley β-glucan or hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC).The variant Q552A recognized xyloglucan and barley β-glucan, but not HEC. No binding to regenerated (noncrystalline) insoluble cellulose was detected consistent with the narrow binding cleft of CBM78RfGH5.The mutagenesis data show that different residues play distinct roles in ligand recognition, explaining why this CBM can bind to a range of β-glucans.

Family Firsts

First Identified
CBM78 from the Ruminococcus flavefaciens CBM78RfGH5 and CBM78RfGH26 .
First Structural Characterization
The first available crystal structure and the first complex structure of a CBM78 is from CBM78RfGH5.

References

  1. Rincon MT, Dassa B, Flint HJ, Travis AJ, Jindou S, Borovok I, Lamed R, Bayer EA, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Antonopoulos DA, Berg Miller ME, and White BA. (2010) Abundance and diversity of dockerin-containing proteins in the fiber-degrading rumen bacterium, Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1. PLoS One. 5, e12476. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0012476 | PubMed ID:20814577 | HubMed [RinconMT2010]
  2. Venditto I, Luis AS, Rydahl M, Schückel J, Fernandes VO, Vidal-Melgosa S, Bule P, Goyal A, Pires VM, Dourado CG, Ferreira LM, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Knox JP, Baslé A, Najmudin S, Gilbert HJ, Willats WG, and Fontes CM. (2016) Complexity of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome reflects an expansion in glycan recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113, 7136-41. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1601558113 | PubMed ID:27298375 | HubMed [VendittoI2016]
  3. Fontes CM and Gilbert HJ. (2010) Cellulosomes: highly efficient nanomachines designed to deconstruct plant cell wall complex carbohydrates. Annu Rev Biochem. 79, 655-81. DOI:10.1146/annurev-biochem-091208-085603 | PubMed ID:20373916 | HubMed [Fontes2010]
  4. Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, and Davies GJ. (2004) Carbohydrate-binding modules: fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochem J. 382, 769-81. DOI:10.1042/BJ20040892 | PubMed ID:15214846 | HubMed [Boraston2004]
All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed