CAZypedia needs your help! We have many unassigned GH, PL, CE, AA, GT, and CBM pages in need of Authors and Responsible Curators.
Scientists at all career stages, including students, are welcome to contribute to CAZypedia. Read more here, and in the 10th anniversary article in Glycobiology.
New to the CAZy classification? Read this first.
*
Consider attending the 15th Carbohydrate Bioengineering Meeting in Ghent, 5-8 May 2024.

Glycoside Hydrolase Family 81

From CAZypedia
Revision as of 15:27, 21 July 2020 by Julie Grondin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Under construction icon-blue-48px.png

This page is currently under construction. This means that the Responsible Curator has deemed that the page's content is not quite up to CAZypedia's standards for full public consumption. All information should be considered to be under revision and may be subject to major changes.


Glycoside Hydrolase Family GH81
Clan none
Mechanism inverting
Active site residues not known
CAZy DB link
http://www.cazy.org/GH81.html


Substrate specificities

GH81 family are endo-β(1,3)-glucanases (EC 3.2.1.39) with diverse physiological roles, such as plant biomass degradation, cell cycling, and enzymatic pathogen defense. They are mostly found in bacteria and fungi, particularly abundant in Saccharomyces, and Streptomyces species. Activity has been demonstrated on laminarin [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], curdlan [1, 3, 5, 6], and pachyman [2, 5].

Kinetics and Mechanism

GH81 enzymes follow an inverting mechanism, first shown by 1H-NMR during the hydrolysis of laminarioligosaccharides [7], and laminarin [2], thus operating by a single-displacement mechanism.

Catalytic Residues

Primary sequence alignments of GH81 reveal a number of highly conserved residues, including two glutamate residues and one aspartate residue which are located in the active site cleft and likely to serve as catalytic residues [3, 4, 8].

Mutagenesis experiments, chemical rescue, and examination of the active site architecture and product conformational itinerary of ligand complexes strongly suggest that one of the two glutamic acids (E542 in GH81 from Bacillus halodurans C-125) acts as the catalytic base by activating a correctly positioned catalytic water, and the aspartic acid (D422 in BhGH81) acts as the catalytic acid [5, 6, 8]. While mutagenesis studies show that mutation of the second glutamic acid (E546 in BhGH81) results in a dramatic reduction in activity [8], there is conflicting evidence for the role of this residue in catalysis. Pluvinage et al. report that this residue is not correctly positioned to assist in catalysis [5], while Zhou et al. proposes that this residue is the catalytic acid, as the distance between the two glutamic acids is ideal for the inverting mechanism displayed by these enzymes [4]. As such, the exact identity of the catalytic residues for GH81 enzymes remains unclear.

Three-dimensional structures

Figure 1. Structure of Lam81A from Rhizomucor meihei (PDB ID 4K3A). Domain A (blue) and Domain C (green) comprise the core of the enzyme, with domain B (orange) acting as a stabilizer. The proposed catalytic residues are shown as red sticks.

GH81 are multimodular, although the composition of the domains can vary. The first characterized structure, Lam81A from Rhizomucor miehei CAU432, comprises an N-terminal β-sandwich domain (domain A), a small α/β domain (domain B), and a C-terminal (α/α)6 domain (domain C) [4]. Domains A and C form the core of the enzyme (likely stabilized by domain B), each contributing residues to the active and substrate binding sites (Figure 1). This architecture is largely conserved in the GH81 from Bacillus halodurans C-125 (BhGH81) [5], and the cellulosomal GH81 from Clostridium themocellum ATCC 27405 (CtLam81A) [6], however, the C-terminal domain is a CBM56 in BhGH81 and a cellulosomal dockerin in CtLam81A.

GH81 structures are unique among GHs and also differ from other characterized endo-β(1,3)-glucanases in the PDB. As such, GH81 is not classified into any GH clan.

Figure 2. The structure of GH81 from Bacillus halodurans suggests that GH81 are capable of binding helical forms of β-glucans PDB ID 5T4G). The triple helical structure of curdlan (beige, yellow, cyan) is shown, with the pitch (16Å) and spacing (5.3Å) between strands indicated. Figure from [5]

Spanning domains A and C is a large cleft (10Å deep, 10Å wide, 70Å long), in which the proposed catalytic residues are located. Extensive co-crystallization of BhGH81 in complex with a range of laminarioligosaccharides clearly defines the catalytic and ancillary binding subsites, and also provides structural evidence for the ability of this enzyme for to generate a pool of oligosaccharide products [5]. Notably, these structures reveal ability of this enzyme to simultaneously bind oligosaccharides in the active and ancillary binding sites, and further suggests that this enzyme binds and cleaves helical forms of β-1,3-glucans in an endo-processive manner [5] (Figure 2).

Family Firsts

First stereochemistry determination
β-glucan binding protein (GBP) from soybean (Glycine max L.) by 1H-NMR [7].
First 3-D structure
Lam81A from Rhizomucor miehei CAU432 [4].

References

  1. Fontaine T, Hartland RP, Beauvais A, Diaquin M, and Latge JP. (1997). Purification and characterization of an endo-1,3-beta-glucanase from Aspergillus fumigatus. Eur J Biochem. 1997;243(1-2):315-21. DOI:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.0315a.x | PubMed ID:9030754 [Fontaine1997]
  2. McGrath CE and Wilson DB. (2006). Characterization of a Thermobifida fusca beta-1,3-glucanase (Lam81A) with a potential role in plant biomass degradation. Biochemistry. 2006;45(47):14094-100. DOI:10.1021/bi061757r | PubMed ID:17115704 [McGrath2006]
  3. Martín-Cuadrado AB, Fontaine T, Esteban PF, del Dedo JE, de Medina-Redondo M, del Rey F, Latgé JP, and de Aldana CR. (2008). Characterization of the endo-beta-1,3-glucanase activity of S. cerevisiae Eng2 and other members of the GH81 family. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45(4):542-53. DOI:10.1016/j.fgb.2007.09.001 | PubMed ID:17933563 [Martin-Cuadrado2008]
  4. Zhou P, Chen Z, Yan Q, Yang S, Hilgenfeld R, and Jiang Z. (2013). The structure of a glycoside hydrolase family 81 endo-β-1,3-glucanase. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2013;69(Pt 10):2027-38. DOI:10.1107/S090744491301799X | PubMed ID:24100321 [Zhou2013]
  5. Pluvinage B, Fillo A, Massel P, and Boraston AB. (2017). Structural Analysis of a Family 81 Glycoside Hydrolase Implicates Its Recognition of β-1,3-Glucan Quaternary Structure. Structure. 2017;25(9):1348-1359.e3. DOI:10.1016/j.str.2017.06.019 | PubMed ID:28781080 [Pluvinage2017]
  6. Kumar K, Correia MAS, Pires VMR, Dhillon A, Sharma K, Rajulapati V, Fontes CMGA, Carvalho AL, and Goyal A. (2018). Novel insights into the degradation of β-1,3-glucans by the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum revealed by structure and function studies of a family 81 glycoside hydrolase. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;117:890-901. DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.003 | PubMed ID:29870811 [Kumar2018]
  7. Fliegmann J, Montel E, Djulić A, Cottaz S, Driguez H, and Ebel J. (2005). Catalytic properties of the bifunctional soybean beta-glucan-binding protein, a member of family 81 glycoside hydrolases. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(29):6647-52. DOI:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.10.060 | PubMed ID:16297387 [Fliegmann2005]
  8. McGrath CE, Vuong TV, and Wilson DB. (2009). Site-directed mutagenesis to probe catalysis by a Thermobifida fusca beta-1,3-glucanase (Lam81A). Protein Eng Des Sel. 2009;22(6):375-82. DOI:10.1093/protein/gzp015 | PubMed ID:19435780 [McGrath2009]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed