CAZypedia needs your help!
We have many unassigned pages in need of Authors and Responsible Curators. See a page that's out-of-date needs a touch-up? - you are welcome to become a CAZypedian. Here's how.
Scientists at all career stages, including students, are welcome to contribute
Read more about CAZypedia here, and in the 10th anniversary article in Glycobiology.
New to the CAZy classification? Read this first.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sequence-based classification"

From CAZypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'The elucidation of both inverting and retaining enzymes by Gloster et al. [''(2008) Chem. Biol.''] <cite>Gloster2008</cite> probably deserves special mention in the GH section. …')
 
(Blanked the page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The elucidation of both inverting and retaining enzymes by Gloster et al. [''(2008) Chem. Biol.''] <cite>Gloster2008</cite> probably deserves special mention in the GH section.  As far as I know, this is the only exception to the one family-one mechanism postulate.
 
  
<biblio>
 
#Gloster2008 pmid=18848471
 
</biblio>
 
 
[[User:Harry Brumer|Harry Brumer]] 13:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 

Latest revision as of 22:20, 10 August 2010